Good job again from Shapo...he is starting to become a player, slowly but surely. He has a long way to go though...rafa will remind him that I am sure.
As for JDMP...Anyone that can hit consistently to his backhand and maybe follow it to the net every now and then will bother him.
I still maintain that if after the first unsuccessful surgery him and his team concentrated on building him a single hander, it would not be worse than what his double hander is today. He had , what, 4-5 years to build it and it is not like he would have been starting from scratch. He already had a slice and I bet you anything he has been hitting serviceable single handers in training for years. Most players do. And vice versa. Players have built themselves brand new serves, forehands in less amount of time than what Delpo had...
Anyways, all the best to JDMP. I like the guy and I wish things were different for him.
Roger moves on 6-2, 6-1.
It's true that Rafa's draw is much tougher. But it probably just got a bit softer. Raonic just lost the first set to Mannarino. And Sasha's got a bad foot, and took 3 sets to beat Gasquet, with his bad back.Rafa has a tough road.
2nd R - Borna Coric (a guy with a winning record against Rafa although most of the wins are when Rafa was compromised).
3rd R - JMDP (has beaten Rafa even when Rafa was not compromised)
QF - Milos (with local crowd behind him)
SF - Sasha (with momentum)
F - RF (need I say anything)
Ask @JesuslookslikeBorg, who has been championing Coric for years. Certainly more complicated than Peter Polansky, especially given their history.I think that's the first time that "Borna Coric" and "formidable" have been paired.
Anyhow, I agree that Thiem is a bit overrated by some - those who see him as a future elite. I've been saying for awhile that he's more in the same category as "second tier" types like Tsonga and Berdych, but will have better chances to win Slams because of the fact he'll still be in his prime when the Big Four are gone.
Ask @JesuslookslikeBorg, who has been championing Coric for years. Certainly more complicated than Peter Polansky, especially given their history.
I basically agree with you on Thiem. I think he's a solid player, with lots of upside. He just over-plays. He's not going to change the tennis world, as Sasha Zverev or Nick Kyrgios might, but he's a type to take his chances, especially, as you imply, that his best could come in a transition period.