When will Nadal beat Djokovic again?

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,282
Reactions
6,027
Points
113
Here's a narrative...

Rafa was in his prime in 2011--just as good as he was in his best year, 2010--and Novak still surpassed him. That's hard to refute. Then Novak coasted a bit, Roger made a charge and Andy improved, so 2012 truly was the Year of the Big Four. Novak was the first among near-equals, but just a hair above his rivals.

2013 was the Return of Rafa, which was just enough to surpass Novak, although the 2012-13 version of Novak who was the same player skillwise as in 2011, but without the manic desire to rise to the top. Novak continued to coast in 2014 as Rafa began to crumble. Roger rose back up to his late-career plateau level, just a bit below peak Rafa and Novak, and Andy floundered. So Novak's reign wasn't hugely challenged.

Now we come to 2015, which on paper looks like Novak's best year. Is he a better player than he was in 2012-14? As good or better than 2011? Well I think he's been pretty similar the last five years, but 2011 just had extra drive. 2015 is a combination of a bit more drive again--Novak being unsatisfied with his "great-but-not-GOAT" 2012-14 level--combined with Rafa fading even more and no one else stepping up.

So again, I think he's been basically the same player for five years, but it is a matter of how driven he's been. He truly had fire in his belly in 2011 and, as Kieran said, sparks coming out of his eyes. He didn't lose anything in 2012-14, except that he had gained his cruising speed after the acceleration of 2011. Perhaps 2015 is another push on the gas, but without the dramatic impact of 2011 because of lesser competition.

Actually, in a way Novak's 2015 reminds me a bit of Roger in 2004-07. Both were as good or a bit better than everyone at almost every aspect of the game which, taken as a whole, led to dominance. Yet where Novak at Rafa, Andy, and Roger tarnishing the armor in 2012-14, ok and moments of Stan, Roger only really had Rafa ruining the party.

I'd even say that Novak, as a player, isn't as good at his very best as some other players are at their very best. Roger at his best can beat just about anyone, except now on clay and slow hards. But the problem is that he can't get to his very best as often as he used to. But what makes Novak so amazing, in my opinion, is that he can get to his almost best, his "B game" if you will, pretty much at will.

Something like this - 2015 versions:

Novak's A game: 30%
Novak's B game: 65%
Novak's C game: 5%

Roger's A game: 20%
Roger's B game: 50%
Roger's C game: 30%

This is Roger's problem. He has to play his A game to beat Novak. His A game will beat Novak in most cases. But his B game will only beat Novak's C game, which almost never happens.

Hope that makes sense...
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,004
Reactions
3,946
Points
113
Kieran said:
Front242 said:
Out of interest, what makes you think everyone else can't play better than they currently are too? There are more than 2 guys in the top 100 :p

The point being, it won't make any difference what other players do once Nadal gets back near to his best. ;)

Don't you mean if and not when ? :p It's a common error in fairness, wenn means if in German, so I guess you meant if :D
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
Front242 said:
Kieran said:
Front242 said:
Out of interest, what makes you think everyone else can't play better than they currently are too? There are more than 2 guys in the top 100 :p

The point being, it won't make any difference what other players do once Nadal gets back near to his best. ;)

Don't you mean if and not when ? :p It's a common error in fairness, wenn means if in German, so I guess you meant if :D

I know we're all unfortunately German colonies now but I don't speak their tongue, not even wenn, not even if... ;)
 

Fiero425

The GOAT
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Messages
11,559
Reactions
2,601
Points
113
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
fiero4251.blogspot.com
Front242 said:
Out of interest, what makes you think everyone else can't play better than they currently are too? There are more than 2 guys in the top 100. :p

That's really questionable! I've been railing on here for years about the gutless play of the rest of the tour! It used to be the "Big 4," then Big 3, now it virtually is just the "Big 2" with Murray allowing himself to be schooled by an old man; nary picking up a set against Federer in Majors and Masters 1000 events! This shouldn't be happening because I don't think Roger's necessary playing that well! He's effective, but I think his success is fueled by inadequate play of the other pros; frequently forgetting how to play the game in the crunch! What happened to Murray who practically owned Roger a few years ago? Federer's winning, but this is getting embarrassing for everyone below him allowing this to go on! The final test will be if Rafa and Roger can make the final to see if what I've been saying is true! Can Rafa continue his dominance over the GOAT or is he just as bad as the rest of the tour? :cover :nono :p :eyepop :ras: :angel:
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,004
Reactions
3,946
Points
113
Murray never practically owned Federer, ever. I must have missed that.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
I would say, El Dude, that Rafa wasn't as good in 2011 as he was in 2010, but I put that down to Novak rattling him. He wasn't rattled in 2010, he was brimming with confidence and he swept everybody aside. I think the only man in the open era to win 3 slams on 3 different surfaces in the one season? And consecutively? Whatever, Rafa was definitely more sure and confident in 2010 than 2011. It's like you say of Novak in 2012-2013, "the same player skill wise as 2011, but without the sand manic drive."

Rafa was similar skill wise in 2011, but without "the calm", which is the ingredient that makes him indestructible. Now before the Nole fans spit the dummy, I give Novak credit for that because he's the only player Rafa has faced who ever got under his skin...
 

Fiero425

The GOAT
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Messages
11,559
Reactions
2,601
Points
113
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
fiero4251.blogspot.com
Front242 said:
Murray never practically owned Federer, ever. I must have missed that.

OTTH, Andy had a significant lead over Roger; by at least 8 matches, but it's turned around since Murray's better days of majors and medaling in the Olympics! Anybody? Been a long day and I'm fried! :cover :p :nono :angel: :dodgy:
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,004
Reactions
3,946
Points
113
He didn't have PRP treatment in 2011 if that's what you mean by "the calm" :snicker
 

nehmeth

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
8,628
Reactions
1,679
Points
113
Location
State College, PA
I'd ask Billie and Denisovich to weigh in if they were here...

A couple of weeks ago, I watched Novak play Ralf in 2011's Rome, Monte Carlo, Indian Wells and U.S. Open tournaments.

I have watched most of Novak's matches this year, his good ones and his 'enough-to-get-by" matches. I still contend, that his serve, depth of shot, approaches and volleys are much better than in 2011. Not sure how many of Novak's matches Kieran's watched this year, but I'm sure it's not nearly as often as he watched him in 2011. :snicker.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
Front242 said:
He didn't have PRP treatment in 2011 if that's what you mean by "the calm" :snicker

A legal treatment, but it was no match for a gluten-free hard boiled egg... :)
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,004
Reactions
3,946
Points
113
Kieran said:
Front242 said:
He didn't have PRP treatment in 2011 if that's what you mean by "the calm" :snicker

A legal treatment, but it was no match for a gluten-free hard boiled egg... :)

I'm not gonna ramble on and on about this as I've already posted tons of links to show you that eventhough it's now legal, PRP treatment is performance enhancing and I was merely pointing out to you why his 2010 and 2013 were so good, because he had it done in 2010 and late 2012. Quite a coincidence. And I'll leave it at that.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
nehmeth said:
I'd ask Billie and Denisovich to weigh in if they were here...

A couple of weeks ago, I watched Novak play Ralf in 2011's Rome, Monte Carlo, Indian Wells and U.S. Open tournaments.

I have watched most of Novak's matches this year, his good ones and his 'enough-to-get-by" matches. I still contend, that his serve, depth of shot, approaches and volleys are much better than in 2011. Not sure how many of Novak's matches Kieran's watched this year, but I'm sure it's not nearly as often as he watched him in 2011. :snicker.

I watched enough to see that nobody is rocking him back on his heels. He's playing great, but he's also being allowed to play great. Even still, he made heavy weather of a couple of slam finals against the octogenarian, and he was blessed that Muzza ran away just when he'd taken control in Oz. I wouldn't set too much store by Nole hammering makeweights, buddy. That kinda thinking has Fedfans deluded, we don't want it to happen to you too... :)
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,004
Reactions
3,946
Points
113
Fiero425 said:
Front242 said:
Murray never practically owned Federer, ever. I must have missed that.

OTTH, Andy had a significant lead over Roger; by at least 8 matches, but it's turned around since Murray's better days of majors and medaling in the Olympics! Anybody? Been a long day and I'm fried! :cover :p :nono :angel: :dodgy:

Roger won all the slam encounters bar one in 2013 when he was already well over the hill (and it still took 5 sets to beat him). Andy's other victories, frankly, won't really go down in history. Credit to him for the Olympic victory but he beat an old fart who only won his last match prior to that 19-17 in the 3rd set so it was expected really. Even a young guy would be a wrecked after that, let alone a veteran pro on tour for years.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
Front242 said:
Kieran said:
Front242 said:
He didn't have PRP treatment in 2011 if that's what you mean by "the calm" :snicker

A legal treatment, but it was no match for a gluten-free hard boiled egg... :)

I'm not gonna ramble on and on about this as I've already posted tons of links to show you that eventhough it's now legal, PRP treatment is performance enhancing and I was merely pointing out to you why his 2010 and 2013 were so good, because he had it done in 2010 and late 2012. Quite a coincidence. And I'll leave it at that.

So is running around a track performance enhancing, and apparently sitting on an egg like a penguin. You posted a lot of links you hardly read yourself, buddy. You never forgave young Ralph for exposing the myth of Federer. Took a kid from an island, but he got the job done. Hope they both make the final on Sunday, give us another round of that... :popcorn
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
Front242 said:
Fiero425 said:
Front242 said:
Murray never practically owned Federer, ever. I must have missed that.

OTTH, Andy had a significant lead over Roger; by at least 8 matches, but it's turned around since Murray's better days of majors and medaling in the Olympics! Anybody? Been a long day and I'm fried! :cover :p :nono :angel: :dodgy:

Roger won all the slam encounters bar one in 2013 when he was already well over the hill (and it still took 5 sets to beat him). Andy's other victories, frankly, won't really go down in history. Credit to him for the Olympic victory but he beat an old fart who only won his last match prior to that 19-17 in the 3rd set so it was expected really. Even a young guy would be a wrecked after that, let alone a veteran pro on tour for years.

What the bloody heck! Federer is even further over that hill now, my friend, and he hammered Murray at Wimbledon! Fiero is correct! Murray was ahead in the H2H and now he barely wins a set. Over the hill? Then how the heck is he doing it? :cover
 

Riotbeard

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,810
Reactions
12
Points
38
Kieran said:
Front242 said:
He didn't have PRP treatment in 2011 if that's what you mean by "the calm" :snicker

A legal treatment, but it was no match for a gluten-free hard boiled egg... :)

Good on them both? Every major athlete benefits from modern health technology. The point is to make the playing field fair (so don't break any rules), and don't allow a PED arms race if the PED's in question are ultimately bad for the person's health. Plenty of natural supplements are performance enhancing. The wrong is in taking an unfair advantage or making it to where players have to damage their health to compete.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,282
Reactions
6,027
Points
113
Kieran said:
I would say, El Dude, that Rafa wasn't as good in 2011 as he was in 2010, but I put that down to Novak rattling him. He wasn't rattled in 2010, he was brimming with confidence and he swept everybody aside. I think the only man in the open era to win 3 slams on 3 different surfaces in the one season? And consecutively? Whatever, Rafa was definitely more sure and confident in 2010 than 2011. It's like you say of Novak in 2012-2013, "the same player skill wise as 2011, but without the sand manic drive."

Rafa was similar skill wise in 2011, but without "the calm", which is the ingredient that makes him indestructible. Now before the Nole fans spit the dummy, I give Novak credit for that because he's the only player Rafa has faced who ever got under his skin...

I hate to say it, Kieran, but the numbers paint a very clear picture about this. I've mentioned this a few times, but Rafa's record against all non-Novak opponents was almost exactly the same in 2011 than it was in 2010. Take a look:

Overall
2010: 71-10
2011: 69-15

vs. Novak
2010: 2-0
2011: 0-6

vs. Everyone else
2010: 69-10
2011: 69-9

So there you have it. Rafa was just about EXACTLY the same player...it is just that Novak utterly dominated him. You can even look at the two years side-by-side on the Wikipedia page. Those six losses were all finals at big tournaments: 4 Masters and 2 Slams.

So again, Rafa was exactly the same player in 2011 as he was in 2010, but here's the difference: except when he played Novak in a final. And I think the difference there was simply that Novak out-played him. For most of the year, Novak caught fire and played at a level that was almost unparalleled in the sport. As good as Rafa has been, he's never had a year like Novak's 2011 or 2015.

This is also why I see the entire span of 2008-13 as Rafa's prime. 2008 was clearly a breakthrough to a new level. 2009 saw an injury-marred season. 2010 was his overall best year, with 3 Slam finals. 2011 was the same in terms of his overall level, but Novak rose even higher. 2012 was another injury marred year, and then 2013 was his last rise to the top (maybe 2016 will be his Indian Summer?).
 

the AntiPusher

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,021
Reactions
7,150
Points
113
El Dude said:
Kieran said:
I would say, El Dude, that Rafa wasn't as good in 2011 as he was in 2010, but I put that down to Novak rattling him. He wasn't rattled in 2010, he was brimming with confidence and he swept everybody aside. I think the only man in the open era to win 3 slams on 3 different surfaces in the one season? And consecutively? Whatever, Rafa was definitely more sure and confident in 2010 than 2011. It's like you say of Novak in 2012-2013, "the same player skill wise as 2011, but without the sand manic drive."

Rafa was similar skill wise in 2011, but without "the calm", which is the ingredient that makes him indestructible. Now before the Nole fans spit the dummy, I give Novak credit for that because he's the only player Rafa has faced who ever got under his skin...

I hate to say it, Kieran, but the numbers paint a very clear picture about this. I've mentioned this a few times, but Rafa's record against all non-Novak opponents was almost exactly the same in 2011 than it was in 2010. Take a look:

Overall
2010: 71-10
2011: 69-15

vs. Novak
2010: 2-0
2011: 0-6

vs. Everyone else
2010: 69-10
2011: 69-9

So there you have it. Rafa was just about EXACTLY the same player...it is just that Novak utterly dominated him. You can even look at the two years side-by-side on the Wikipedia page. Those six losses were all finals at big tournaments: 4 Masters and 2 Slams.

So again, Rafa was exactly the same player in 2011 as he was in 2010, but here's the difference: except when he played Novak in a final. And I think the difference there was simply that Novak out-played him. For most of the year, Novak caught fire and played at a level that was almost unparalleled in the sport. As good as Rafa has been, he's never had a year like Novak's 2011 or 2015.

This is also why I see the entire span of 2008-13 as Rafa's prime. 2008 was clearly a breakthrough to a new level. 2009 saw an injury-marred season. 2010 was his overall best year, with 3 Slam finals. 2011 was the same in terms of his overall level, but Novak rose even higher. 2012 was another injury marred year, and then 2013 was his last rise to the top (maybe 2016 will be his Indian Summer?).

Let's increase the sample size here, El Dude can you provide us with Rafa's records against Djoker and the top 30 ( please include 2008-2013 , his prime years . Also, note Rafa was the only player who had a winning H2h against everyone in 2013-2014.
 

nehmeth

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
8,628
Reactions
1,679
Points
113
Location
State College, PA
Back to topic:
Without a significant drop in Novak's level of play, I don't see Rafa beating him anytime soon.
(imo)
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,282
Reactions
6,027
Points
113
the AntiPusher said:
Let's increase the sample size here, El Dude can you provide us with Rafa's records against Djoker and the top 30 ( please include 2008-2013 , his prime years . Also, note Rafa was the only player who had a winning H2h against everyone in 2013-2014.

I'm sorry, but what's the point of that? My post was in response to Kieran's statement that Rafa wasn't quite as good in 2011 as he was in 2010. The numbers rather definitively show us otherwise.

I'm not talking at all about other years, or Rafa vs. Novak in terms of their overall careers. I'm just addressing Kieran's statement about 2011.