Fiero425
The GOAT
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2013
- Messages
- 11,513
- Reactions
- 2,576
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Website
- fiero4251.blogspot.com
That's your opinion as I didn't see how it all unfolded. Regardless of how the games were won, you do agree that in this scenario 3 games were lost by Vika and then 3 games were lost by Serena, correct? So games are won and lost.sk310 said:kskate2 said:I'm not a zealot. I would say that about any player who had a 3-0 lead and lost it no matter what their name was.sk310 said:If my reading of your comment was incorrect I apologize.
You took what I said: Vika came back from 0-3 and you flipped it to sound like the only way Vika could have come back would be if Serena let it go. It's a way of saying everything is on Serena's racquet not the other player doing something right. It's a classic tactic of people on this forum who can't stand anyone but Serena being complimented when talking about a match involving her.
(Note: I am also a huge Serena fan just not a zealot)
Right and I explained that Vika's service level dropped dramatically in her first service game which Serena took full advantage of and raced to an 3-0 lead over Vika. VIKA made up the deficit. SERENA did not "let it go."
Kieran said:Two double faults at deuce... :laydownlaughing :laydownlaughing
kskate2 said:Not so fast Kieran. Vika is one tough competitor. She will not go away. Serena will have to earn it