Miami Open, Miami, FL, 2025 - ATP 1000

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
48,272
Reactions
31,560
Points
113
Why not? I like the attitude. Shame he couldn't hang on to that 2nd set.
Seb had been having wrist problems again, he withdrew from his doubles match yesterday ( wrist ) there were rumors he might have withdrawn against Novak
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Moxie

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
48,272
Reactions
31,560
Points
113
Okay Matteo we dont need Fritz to hang around in Miami any longer as Fils did the job and defeated Zverev yesterday:)
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,543
Reactions
6,369
Points
113
I'll never really understand why Murray inspires so much animosity around here, but I think you're right to give him a "special category." The WAS a time when we talked of a Big Four, and it was longer than people remember. Novak came up to #3 in 2007, Murray to #4 in 2008, so it was 3 years that Novak and Andy were bunched together below Roger and Rafa, before Novak's big leap in 2011. The gap between Murray and the other 3 did widen after that, but no other player in the Big 3 era came anything like that close to accomplishing as much as he did in the Big 3 era.
Yes, true, though I think the "Big Four" era was an oscillation....if it started with Andy joining the fray in 2008, 2008-10 was still Fedal with Rafa taking the lead, and Novak and Andy a bit behind, especially in 09-10. In 2011 it was Novak jumping ahead with Rafa next, then "Fedray." 2012 was the most balanced year of the Big Four, all four winning a Slam but Novak being first among near equals. 2013 was Rafa regaining the throne with Novak next, then Fedray a bit behind. 2014 was Novak returning to first among equals, with Fedal behind, and then Murray slipping back. 2015 was Novak's year, with Roger and Andy a lap or two behind. 2016 was Djoray, 2017 was Fedal redux and Andy falling away...

If 2008-16 was the Big Four Era, here are the top 10 players by GOAT points during that period of time:

514 Djokovic
383 Nadal
323 Federer
268 Murray
85 Ferrer
83 Wawrinka
77 Del Potro
68 Berdych
59 Tsonga
54 Nishikori

GOAT points are imperfect, but they illustrate the point: There was a much bigger gap between Andy and the pack, than the Bigger Three and Andy...during the time he was in his prime. The gap becomes larger when we look at their whole careers. But from 2008-16, Andy most definitely was part of a "Big Four," of which Novak was the clear leader. Notice that the gap between Nadal and Federer and Federer and Murray is about the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,933
Reactions
15,099
Points
113
Yes, true, though I think the "Big Four" era was an oscillation....if it started with Andy joining the fray in 2008, 2008-10 was still Fedal with Rafa taking the lead, and Novak and Andy a bit behind, especially in 09-10. In 2011 it was Novak jumping ahead with Rafa next, then "Fedray." 2012 was the most balanced year of the Big Four, all four winning a Slam but Novak being first among near equals. 2013 was Rafa regaining the throne with Novak next, then Fedray a bit behind. 2014 was Novak returning to first among equals, with Fedal behind, and then Murray slipping back. 2015 was Novak's year, with Roger and Andy a lap or two behind. 2016 was Djoray, 2017 was Fedal redux and Andy falling away...

If 2008-16 was the Big Four Era, here are the top 10 players by GOAT points during that period of time:

514 Djokovic
383 Nadal
323 Federer
268 Murray
85 Ferrer
83 Wawrinka
77 Del Potro
68 Berdych
59 Tsonga
54 Nishikori

GOAT points are imperfect, but they illustrate the point: There was a much bigger gap between Andy and the pack, than the Bigger Three and Andy...during the time he was in his prime. The gap becomes larger when we look at their whole careers. But from 2008-16, Andy most definitely was part of a "Big Four," of which Novak was the clear leader. Notice that the gap between Nadal and Federer and Federer and Murray is about the same.
We can always count on you to back it up with the numbers. Thanks.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: El Dude

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
48,272
Reactions
31,560
Points
113
Oh No Matteo what a time to miss that volley at the net
Saving MPs off to a TB for the 2nd set
Dai Matteo!
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,543
Reactions
6,369
Points
113
I think that, at his very best, Berrettini is a better player than Fritz, but Taylor is just more steady and is less likely to lose the match due to mistakes than Matteo is. Berrettini seems a bit volatile and prone to bad moments, whereas Fritz just hammers away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
48,272
Reactions
31,560
Points
113
I think that, at his very best, Berrettini is a better player than Fritz, but Taylor is just more steady and is less likely to lose the match due to mistakes than Matteo is. Berrettini seems a bit volatile and prone to bad moments, whereas Fritz just hammers away.
Fritz leads their H2H 4-0, Matteo won his first TB against Fritz in this match out of 4 meetings
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,543
Reactions
6,369
Points
113
Matteo is prone to the occasional brilliant shot, which no one can accuse Taylor of. Fritz is workmanlike and rather boring, whereas Berrettini oscillates from brilliant to quasi-headcase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
48,272
Reactions
31,560
Points
113
Matteo is prone to the occasional brilliant shot, which no one can accuse Taylor of. Fritz is workmanlike and rather boring, whereas Berrettini oscillates from brilliant to quasi-headcase.
Actually I have been impressed with Fritz ROS in this match
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
48,272
Reactions
31,560
Points
113
Great defense from Fritz and he will serve for a place in the SF
Matteo has never had a BP since the 1st set