Djokovic i think lost 1st set in many of the matches last year, he still got through. Kyrgios played well, lost
grass is not like clay. Some that say it has no clue what they are talking about. Nadal got blasted bu clowns like dustin brown, gilles muller, steve darcis, rosol.. clowns who at french would’ve been lucky to het a set.
it’s a dangerous surface which makes roger’s and novak’s dominance extra hard. Any slasher can take racquet out of anyone’s hands.
what made roger so good and makes novak is good is their all court game, they did and do everything well. It is a misconception that it’s all about serve… if so, isner and ivo would have a few titles. Sampras was an all court player with a great serve. Grass rewards athleticism, speed, agility as it’s tricky to move on grass. It rewards an all court game. Novak had all these qualities and has upper hand on anyone but it’s a dangerous surface.
alcaraz had an all court game so will be interesting to see how he does.
grass is not like clay. Some that say it has no clue what they are talking about. Nadal got blasted bu clowns like dustin brown, gilles muller, steve darcis, rosol.. clowns who at french would’ve been lucky to het a set.
it’s a dangerous surface which makes roger’s and novak’s dominance extra hard. Any slasher can take racquet out of anyone’s hands.
what made roger so good and makes novak is good is their all court game, they did and do everything well. It is a misconception that it’s all about serve… if so, isner and ivo would have a few titles. Sampras was an all court player with a great serve. Grass rewards athleticism, speed, agility as it’s tricky to move on grass. It rewards an all court game. Novak had all these qualities and has upper hand on anyone but it’s a dangerous surface.
alcaraz had an all court game so will be interesting to see how he does.