AndrewWilliam said:I hope Murray is alright.
El Dude said:nehmeth said:El Dude said:Denisovich said:El Dude said:herios, I like David Ferrer. But he IS beatable and it is hard seeing him beat any of the "Big Four" in a Final, except for perhaps Andy Murray and a declined Federer. But he's clearly the "best of the rest" and, one could argue, now the 4th best player in the world, at least if and when Roger starts playing better. But I would love to see Ferrer win a Slam - what a great thing for tennis and, I think, would mark the end of the FedalDjokurray Hegemony.
That will not happen. Ferrer will be in a wheelchair the day Murray and Djokovic start losing a step. He is 5 years older. He will have to depend on upsets to win one. A lot of upsets. Granted if that happens, he is likely to win it.
I agree with the gist of this but don't be surprised if Andy and Novak start losing a step as soon as next year when they'll be turning 27, a very common age for players to lose half a step (see "Federer, Roger" and seemingly "Nadal, Rafael").
I'm not saying that Ferrer would be the new player to beat, mind you, just that at some point there's going to be a crack in the "Hegemony" and we'll likely look back on it as a Slam won by someone else. While obviously Djokovic and Murray are the clear favorites, perhaps this tournament isn't done with surprises yet. But while I could see Ferrer beating Andy, if and only if Andy had a head-case match, I just can't see him beating Djokovic under almost any circumstances. So yeah, it would require some upsets.
This reads as though you're reaching to cover yourself (imo). Ferrer is not going to beat Murray on grass unless Andy falls and breaks his leg. The crack in the hegemony as you call it obviously is that Roger is slowing down and is not his dependable self in the slams the way he used to be. Murray and Djokovic will have to lose more than a step for the other guys to have a chance.
I just love being accused of disingenuity! What you perceive as me "reaching to cover myself" is just me being open to possibilities and not having a hard opinion either way.
I don't think the hegemony is being cracked, except as you say because Roger (and perhaps Rafa) is showing obvious signs of decline.
My point is simply that at some point Novak and Andy are going to lose a half-step. It happens to all players, and most around age 27. I've been suggesting that we'll see that next year from them, but that their dominance won't really start being challenged until 2015 or so. But if Ferrer--or anyone--was able to win Wimbledon, to me it might be the tournament that we look back as the early signs of the hegemony breaking up - Roger and Rafa out in the first two rounds and someone else winning it all.
Denisovich said:The tower of Tandil through in straights. Boy, this really is herios' day.
Denisovich said:Herios, you don't like Haas too do you?
nehmeth said:AndrewWilliam said:I hope Murray is alright.
uzzled :laydownlaughing
Andy, remember this formula.
Lost point - he limps and grabs his body parts
Point won - fist pump and celebration.
It doesn't deviate.
herios said:Denisovich said:The tower of Tandil through in straights. Boy, this really is herios' day.
I am not calling it, until "you know who" wins as well
Denisovich said:Herios, you don't like Haas too do you?
I like his story, but not nearly as much as who he is playing.
Denisovich said:herios said:DarthFed said:4 straight games for the mad doctor. Wow!
Hopefully DP has enough left in the tank to knock the Ferret out
Amusing how many of you rooting against David.
If JM takes him out, I won't get upset, because he is one of my core guys.
I am rooting for David only as a contrarian when I am seeing so much adversity.
Well actually it is only me and Darth that don't root for Ferrer. Everyone else here likes him. uzzled
AndrewWilliam said: