calitennis127
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 4,947
- Reactions
- 459
- Points
- 83
Wow, Covid is really surging again in the UK. Scary stuff. Oh wait, it’s not “Covid” doing that. Hmmmm:
Saudi Arabia fails in bid for seat on UN Human Rights Council. This feels like a comedy script being burned in the womb.
Saudi Arabia fails in bid for seat on UN Human Rights Council
China, Russia and Cuba win seats as analysts question whether human rights violators should be elected to the council.www.aljazeera.com
Time for the Saudis to appreciate they were just an oil whore of the United States, and that love affair is drawing to a close.
Interesting info there, Britbox. It does seem the Saudis are seeing their power in the region at least somewhat reduced. The recent peace agreements with Israel by the UAE and Bahrain (which led to Trump’s nomination for a Nobel Peace prize) also raise the question of how important the Saudis are in the region now compared to, say, 20 years ago.
The Saudis might not be deserving but they should qualify for sainthood in comparison to the Chinese who are operating concentration camps to wipe out the Uighurs on a scale to make Goebbels blushSaudi Arabia fails in bid for seat on UN Human Rights Council. This feels like a comedy script being burned in the womb.
Saudi Arabia fails in bid for seat on UN Human Rights Council
China, Russia and Cuba win seats as analysts question whether human rights violators should be elected to the council.www.aljazeera.com
Time for the Saudis to appreciate they were just an oil whore of the United States, and that love affair is drawing to a close.
Yep. Frightening.The Saudis might not be deserving but they should qualify for sainthood in comparison to the Chinese who are operating concentration camps to wipe out the Uighurs on a scale to make Goebbels blush
Yep. Frightening.
I don't think you can just pin that ideology on American Democrats. It applies across the board - Republicans and non-Americans too.And the Chinese government is completely in cahoots with major American corporations, especially the Big Tech companies and the NBA, as well as numerous figures in the Democratic Party. Human rights abuses apparently don't matter to American Democrats when they are profiting massively from them.
I don't think you can just pin that ideology on American Democrats. It applies across the board - Republicans and non-Americans too.
I don't think it matters which cohort of Republicanism you are talking about. If you're looking at it from a level above national politics, on a geopolitical plane, then it's about power, influence and control. That applies to both parties and other nations.It depends on which Republicans you are talking about. If you are talking about Bush/McCain-type neoconservative Republicans, yes, I think they have no problem aligning with regimes whose stated principles don't align with the ones they themselves profess (e.g. John McCain giving aid and comfort to jihadist radicals in Syria). But I actually think Trump-type Republicans are far more consistent. I don't see Trump-style Republicans moralizing constantly and then aligning themselves with foreign governments that contradict those principles.
I don't think it matters which cohort of Republicanism you are talking about. If you're looking at it from a level above national politics, on a geopolitical plane, then it's about power, influence and control. That applies to both parties and other nations.
It's about Democracy? Nope, look at how much the US invested in the Contras over the democratically elected Sandanistas in Nicaragua. It's about human life? Nope, look at Iraq, Libya, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, Palestine...
Let's not pretend for one minute that governments give a f*** about foreign lives. They never did and never will. It's always been about power, control and influence.
But how can you lump Trump in with the Bush/McCain-style Republicans? He has not started any wars or nation-building projects (which is in part why he has received multiple nominations for Nobel peace prizes). To the contrary, Trump has promoted peace in the Middle East. The only people he has attacked are the likes of Baghdadi and Soleimani - each of whom richly deserved their fate.
I'm afraid you are committing the Broken_Shoelace mistake of lumping all Republicans into the same category. That frankly makes no sense. Part of the reason the Bush-Romney-McCain Republican establishment opposed Trump's candidacy so vehemently in 2016 (and now supports Biden over Trump in 2020) is that they profoundly object to Trump's non-interventionist foreign policy.
I never used to follow US domestic politics much, only the foreign policy. So in that respect, Trump does deserve kudos for the lack of military interventions and helping broker those peace deals (BTW, it's worth mentioning there are plenty of other interventions outside of military). However, I do think scrapping the agreement with the Iranians was a bad move. Not solely because of the deal itself, but the way he rode roughshod over European allies. US influence is waning with Europe, particularly on the mainland. I don't think Trump is viewed as a stable or reliable partner by old allies.
I actually think it’s a good thing for Europe to be less influenced by America. I think the U.S. State Department generally has a pernicious effect on the world, especially Europe.
At any rate, why do you have any affection for the Iran nuclear deal? It was clearly done corruptly - with the Iranian regime getting $400 million in cash from the Obama administration in suitcases - and as a vanity trip for Obama. He was ashamed that the Middle East had not reciprocated his overtures at Cairo in 2009 for a new age of Western-Islamic dialogue (in fact, the governments of the Middle East could not have cared less what he had to say) and instead the region descended into chaos in Libya and Syria, with ISIS running wild.
Can’t you see the whole point of the Iran nuclear deal was to give Obama a photo op at all costs?