tented
Administrator
It's OK to refer to Cilic's past doping incident, since that's a matter of public record, but it's not OK to imply he's currently doping.
Front242 said:Cilic will win in 3. Tsonga's toast.
Kieran said:Denisovich said:Kieran said:Federer bought it, Steve Tignor bought it.
Tennis-wise, he's much more easy on the eye than JW, and also has a more suited temperament for big matches. He'll be a respectable opponent for Novak in the semis, but I don't expect him to win there...
Agreed cilic is the tougher opponent, but should be ok, unless cilic has another insane serving day like last years semi and final.
I think his upper-limit this year is the semi. last year he just caught fire and probably couldn't stop himself. This year, he's not going to surprise anyone, and Novak has a good record against him too...
EDIT: But Novak WILL be hoping that Tsonga turns this one around, in a long bloodbath struggle...
Denisovich said:Kieran said:Denisovich said:Agreed cilic is the tougher opponent, but should be ok, unless cilic has another insane serving day like last years semi and final.
I think his upper-limit this year is the semi. last year he just caught fire and probably couldn't stop himself. This year, he's not going to surprise anyone, and Novak has a good record against him too...
EDIT: But Novak WILL be hoping that Tsonga turns this one around, in a long bloodbath struggle...
I can remember a couple of hard matches against Cilic, including 5 setters. Unfortunately someone completely messed up the ATP site, the h2h is no longer researchable.
Denisovich said:I can remember a couple of hard matches against Cilic, including 5 setters. Unfortunately someone completely messed up the ATP site, the h2h is no longer researchable.
Kieran said:DarthFed said:So you believe his story?
I don't believe that these things are all as simple as saying that what Cilic did is the same as Justin gatlin, for example. Federer believes him - does that make a difference to you?
Denisovich said:Cheers, thanks. It was actually only that 5 setter at wimbledon that went the distance. I do remember the RG match was not easy either.
I think the h2h is slightly misleading if they would play here, but yeah should be ok.
Front242 said:Roger knows damn well there's a lot of doping in tennis. Hence why he's been the only one who has asked for samples to be kept for 8 years. Problem is they don't have any intention of either (a) testing properly or (b) re-testing in tennis.
Kieran said:That's nonsense. Cilic didn't get exonerated by the ATP, he was banned. Federer didn't have to say anything, but instead he said that Cilic was stupid, but he didn't believe he was the type of man to cheat. It's unambiguous...
DarthFed said:Kieran said:That's nonsense. Cilic didn't get exonerated by the ATP, he was banned. Federer didn't have to say anything, but instead he said that Cilic was stupid, but he didn't believe he was the type of man to cheat. It's unambiguous...
The ban which was first exposed by Croatian media was shortened because they bought his reason for the failed test. Anyways out of respect to the admins I will drop the subject since it does not relate to this match.
Kieran said:Has JW ever come back from two sets down in a slam, and won? Anybody know?
Kieran said:Has JW ever come back from two sets down in a slam, and won? Anybody know?
DarthFed said:Kieran said:Has JW ever come back from two sets down in a slam, and won? Anybody know?
Sadly I'm all too aware. The deathless one handed the match to him at Wimbledon 2011.