I have to admit it is funny to see BwokenWooWace use this completely conventional, arbitrary, and irrational vocabulary (which was only invented at the start of the 20th century, at Columbia University no less) as though it is some kind of definitive moral categorization that no one can dispute. It truly shows his lack of learning and originality, and also his lack of awareness of world history beyond what has occurred very recently. The vast majority of the human race has not thought in terms of this asinine moral terminology (racist, misogynistic, homophobic, etc.) for most of recorded history and for good reason - it is counter-intuitive and irrational. But yet, the anti-American Broken slavishly follows the lead of some crackpot sociologists at Columbia University in the early 20th century to attain his moral understanding of the universe. Then again, this moral vocabulary suits him: it is cheap, vapid, imprecise, bigoted, and unscientific - just like so much of what he says and thinks about the world.
Bwoken prides himself on being logical and grounded (this is what he imagines himself to be). He also hilariously goes around prating about his belief in "science" - as though arresting people in parks, banning people from buying flowers, and making grown adults wear masks by the millions (two weeks after telling them not to) is pure "science." Sure.
It's funny how I posted a pair of articles yesterday - one about how allowing people to go to parks promotes healthiness and one citing two actual doctors who think the shutdowns should end on public health grounds. Of course, BwokenWooWace had nothing to say about that. And that's because he doesn't actually care about any scientific discussion.
Finally, I have to say: it is quite comical for someone to be accusing other people of being anti-science while adopting the mantle of anti-homophobia. There is nothing - let me repeat, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING - in science to support the current pro-homosexual glorification that goes on in Western countries. There is no evidence of a gay gene. There is no evidence that gays are "born that way." And in fact there is a great deal of science showing there are serious pathologies and dangers to the gay lifestyle for those who engage in it.
Yet you will not hear Mr. "I Believe in Science, Sort of but not really" acknowledge any of that. Instead, he will hilariously use the dumb and demented moral terminology of "racism, misogyny and homophobia" - which is not scientifically grounded in the slightest - while condemning others for not adhering to science. Talk about projection! You couldn't find a better example than that.