brokenshoelace
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reactions
- 1,334
- Points
- 113
Denisovich said:Broken_Shoelace said:Kieran said:Denisovich said:Kieran said:It's not even a discussion, is it? I mean, things are what they are, but this was a terrible bad day for Rafa, because of the back.
A great day for Stan though, and he played great through the tourney, and proved his mettle against Nole, but it can't be seen as anything but a freakishly bad day in a career already blighted by injuries...
Nope. It's not even a discussion. Stan is the deserved champion. He outplayed Nadal when they both were healthy.
In fairness, that wasn't the discussion, but I agree, Stan was playing better at the time, and we don't know if that would have lasted. It doesn't tell us anything about what Broken put to Front - but I like ya style!
And yeah, nobody's arguing whether Stan was deserving or not. But it's hilarious to see people her acting like the match was over.
Deep down inside, most would have still bet their lives on Nadal down a set and 2-0. Let's not even try to argue otherwise because honestly, people would be full of it.
I don't think anyone is acting that way. The point is that that first set and that amazing break are our only reference points. The rest is just speculation, also of the part of the Nadal fans here.
Except I'm not speculating about anything. I said I would have still leaned towards Nadal, but I never said Nadal would have absolutely won, because you're right, that would be speculation.
What did say however, was pure facts, and not speculation. What happened 2 games into the second set onward was due to Nadal's injury. That doesn't mean Nadal would have won, or that Wawrinka would have won anyway, it just means that the action unfolded the way it did because of the injury. I don't quite understand what you're disagreeing with me on.