This is a tough one for me.
While I agree that there is nothing in Rocketman that comes even close to the iconic LIveAid concert recreation, I would go as far as to say it's probably the best depiction of a concert I've seen. However I just felt as a biography Rocketman was truer and deeper. The songs were used to propel the story/mood in Rocketman, so I was OK with the chronological dissonance and the surreal quality to how they were placed. Now considering that Elton John was involved in the production, surprisingly there isn't so much glossing a over and it's a frank depiction of some unfavorable aspects of his life, warts and all.
Bohemian Rhapsody I felt had an easier mark to hit, plus it was a straightforward story which whitewashed Freddie Mercury as far as his sexuality and just seemed more cliche driven.
I dunno, maybe being from the Bay area there were always stories way back of Freddie Mercury hitting the Castro after Queen concerts so his fluidity was an open secret to his fans in my neck of the woods. So the film portraying his early girlfriend as his great love and somehow he suddenly turned gay or bi was a weird pandering in this day and age. This isn't some 40's biopic of Cole Porter. C'mmon, we're talking Freddy Mercury!!
LIsten, lip synching isn't necessarily a bad thing (Marillon Cotillard was amazing as Edith Piaf), but what Taron Egerton did as Elton John, singing the songs himself was impressive to me. It just seemed a very difficult and nuanced portrayal of Elton, though
Rami, make no mistake, was great as Freddie.