I suspect they are under the ilusion cases like the above will be so statistically irrelevant that they won't make a diference in the overall scenario, so they can now say to the activists that they are progressive enough, and later on tell the ones complaining that they were histerical and nothing fundamental has changed.
Needless to say that their assumption is overly stupid. First, records and champions are statistical outliers, to begin with.
Second, once you change the ground rules, you change everything....
People are afraid to have a difficult but needed discussion, so they just hope that they can avoid it by postponing it untill it is not needed anymore.
This is true but the problem is that governments are accepting the erasure of women as a price worth paying, if it keeps the loud and aggressive trans lobby quiet.
I read this in an article in The Sunday Times this weekend and decided to look it up.
On our own government website, with reference to menopause, they tell us that:
When this website talks about “women” it is intended in the most inclusive sense of the word. It is used as shorthand to describe all those who identify as women as well as those that do not identify as women but who share women’s biological realities and experiences. In using this term, we seek to include not exclude.
In other words, ‘woman’ is not a word in itself - it’s ‘shorthand’, a code word for whatever activists insists a woman is, which is basically nothing at all, when you think closely about this. Could be a man, could be a woman: the word ‘woman’ has no defined meaning that is distinct from opinion on what it means.
On a similar government website, regarding prostate cancer, it’s simply titled
A Guide For Men, with photos of men looking like men and no such qualifiers or explanations of why the word ‘men’ is really a shorthand code for something else.
Women are being erased, and at the highest level of governments. Ireland is not alone in practising this misogyny…