Read the thread I started a few days ago, the interview was from a year ago, plus in that same interview he specifically praised Alcaraz as an exception.
What I found interesting is that while he acknowledged the Tsits/Zverev generation was bigger & stronger, his premise was they lacked technical skills. I think this FO supports his premise.
Daydenko was a very hard working player in his day, not quite top tier but very dangerous ( one year beat Nadal decisively in the Miami Masters final) , Ferrer-like one could say. Always liked him so I welcome his insights, considering a world where Pat McEnroe and others get to give their opinions why muzzle Davydenko?
I did see it. I just thought this was a fresh quote from today, or something. i didn't realize it was from the same interview, and that it was from last year.
He's not wrong about Zverev, and, say, Khachanov, though he's improved somewhat from pure ball bashing, and others, but I'd say Tsitsipas has more than a few tools...he's just gutless and self-involved.
I have no problem with Davydenko, per se...while never a fan, it was hard not to admire his commitment, and for a wiry guy, he was built like a rock. He took the ball earlier, and was one of the few to retire with a positive h2h v. Nadal. (5-4, I think.) Fair point that he may as well give an opinion. As I said, I thought that remark was from today, and it wasn't quite apt.