How about australia woul’ve just told him no from beginning? Why provide exemption? Then create this messWell that'll be discussed in court, and if he did nothing, he'll be released. But there are good reasons why he ended up in court, and may still get into heavy trouble: lying on his visa application, missing the deadline for a medical exemption, making a false claim for medical exemption, breaking isolation when he knew he had Covid, this one could be used on character grounds. There are suspicions about the validity of his positive test, though these might be groundless. Even the Serbian government say he's in trouble over treating his positive test as something he needn't be concerned about.
Looking at it objectively, he's given them little option to at least examine his bona fides, which as the judge himself just said, "that part of the case remains unresolved."
It's irrelevant if he's not a danger to anyone, although he was a danger to people when he broke isolation, but that didn't matter to him one little bit...
i’m not a conspiracy theorist but this sounds like one:
morrison: ‘hey, grant him exemption, then we will cancel his visa and show we are taking a hard stance on covid. This will be good for elections coming up’
victotian government: ‘sounds good, great idea. He is also an anti-vaxer so public will be on our side. We will coordinate with tennis australia. What if he appeals?
morrison: ‘alex has powers to revoke in case courts intervene, we have than covered’