Moxie
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,608
- Reactions
- 14,768
- Points
- 113
Except that they lay this court every year, so how can we know?Because historically it has been.
Except that they lay this court every year, so how can we know?Because historically it has been.
I don't see why we should assume that Matteo loses all of his RR matches.This is a must win match for Fed. Assuming Novak wins all his RR matches and Matteo loses all his RR matches, Novak will qualify and Matteo will be eliminated. The second place would go to whoever wins this match between Fed and Thiem.
Or to put it other way, if Fed loses today he might have to win his match against Novak just to advance.
So, Fed better come good right off the bat.
Big loss for Roger today. It probably took him out of the semis, since he’ll probably also lose to Novak.
I said yesterday Fed needed to win in straight sets; dropping match in straights just about cancels him for the weekend in the SF! Anything's possible, but I wouldn't be hopeful! He really needed this win over Thiem and I just didn't see it unless Fed attacked early and often! Getting back into that 1st set was key, but he couldn't finish! There's something missing; the fire wasn't there with any sense of urgency! :whistle:
This is disappointing. I was wishing that Roger win WTF this year. Now, the chances of him even making to the semifinals look flimisy. Unless Roger beats Novak (which is not impossible), Roger is out. Actually, even if Roger wins his match against Novak, it is not guaranteed either, as if Novak, Fed and Thiem all end up with two wins, Roger may not make it considering he lost in straight sets (assuming the other two manage to win a set even in the match that they lose).
This is embarrassing. In the whole of Roger's career there is only one year when he did not advance to the semifinals.
The trouble with WTF is that you cannot play yourself into form. There is no room for such things unlike in a GS. You got to hit the ground running. Roger could not do that today.
In the last game, Thiem served and it apparently touched the net. At least, Roger thought so and so gently tapped the ball back in court instead of doing a real return (and needless to say Thiem thumped it for a winner). Unfortunately, the microphone that sounds on a let did not go on and the umpire did not call a let. That was an unlucky stuff at an important moment.
I am not blaming Roger's loss on that. Roger certainly played terribly throughout the match. He even hit a Novakian overhead.
There is no need to reconfirm that Thiem was a worthy opponent at RG...he's been considered the 2nd or 3rd best on clay for a few years now, depending on the year, and state of Novak. You're right to give him a shout-out, as he has a lot of detractors around here. He's no Rafa, Novak or Roger, certainly. He's much more like a Wawrinka, and not just because of the 1HBH. He's strong, and hard to hit through, when he's on. And he'll still have the benefit of youth when they wane. But, like Stan, he's not always on. He was today, though.This reconfirms how difficult those RG wins were for Rafa in 2018 & 2019 as he had to beat the amazing Thiem in both finals.
Thiem not only leads Federer 5-2 in h2h, but he has also done well against Nole by winning 3 of their last 4 meetings. :heart:
I don't see why we should assume that Matteo loses all of his RR matches.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rolex Paris Masters 2024, Bercy, France - ATP Masters 1000 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 96 | ||
Nitto ATP Finals 2023, Turin, Italy | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 780 | ||
Nitto ATP Finals 2022, Turin, Italy | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 742 | ||
Nitto ATP Finals, 2021, Turin, Italy | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 216 | ||
Nitto ATP Finals, London | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 525 |