GameSetAndMath
The GOAT
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 21,141
- Reactions
- 3,398
- Points
- 113
That's not true. And your post above about an asterisk is puny and lacking any understanding. While hard-headed Federer fans will argue to the death that Rafa carried no injury in his loss to Soderling, evidence tells us otherwise. What we're understanding now about Nadal pulling out of Wimbledon is that the turnaround is too short for the recovery. It IS very short this year. Nadal is 35 and has been trying for the last while to manage his schedule differently than in the past. I think that's obvious.
The clay season is physically intense, and emotionally so, too. I don't think it's terrible to say that Nadal doesn't feel physically up to Wimbledon, or, perhaps, emotionally so. His letdown after RG, which is usually accompanied by a win, came with a loss this year. If you think that manufacturing the intensity he brings to his work comes with an on/off switch, I think you would be wrong. So he's decided he needs a break...not injury, not asterisk, just not ready. Give it a rest.
Thank you for accepting that you would want to put an asterisk to Soderling's victory over Rafa. I don't remember what was @tented's position at that time. But, at least now he has said that he does not put any asterisk. As far as I know most if not all of Nadalites put some kind of asterisk to that loss of Nadal.
Sometimes people get blown off the court. This happens to the very best also. Roger got blown off the court by Cilic at USO once. He also got blown off the court by Thiem in IW finals. (Note: I am not saying that these are the only two occassions). Novak got blown off the court by Stan in RG finals. Just like that Rafa also got simply blown off the court in that 4th round of RG. Most of the Nadalites fail to accept it, partly because Soderling is not a big shot, partly because Rafa and Soderling had bad blood much before that match and mostly because "Rafa never loses a match without injury" theory.