I'm sorry to say this but that's a load of FedTARD stuff you wrote there, the thing you always hear from the fedtards on sites like mtf.
At the start of this debate you brought in even HC and grass as if they were anything similar to clay to play on. Your theory is pretty simple from the start. The faster the better for Roger, only high bounce can hurt him.
Then you compare his results in Rome to the ones in MC where he didn't even bother to show up. In Rome 2003 he faced nobodies, players who played badly and in the semifinal Ferrero retired with shoulder injury, just lol!!! cakewalk for Rogi, but Mantilla, the only decent clay court player with good spin brought him down. He actually made Fed look like a fool, and exactly because Fed had no time to prepare for his strokes like on slow hamburg clay.
Then you're saying Fed won the prized jewel against who? not a real claycourter with heavy topspin, the thing that causes him serious troubles on clay, but Söderling, a ping-pong player. Actually he vultured that title, not won it in a true battle.
Fast court, fast court, fast court, cry the Fedtards. Yes, Fed often said he prefers fast courts generally, but he said things like this too:
“
Obviously the margins are smaller on a quicker court,†Federer said on Friday. “Because let’s say the first game I do get broken because he hits a few good shots and maybe I serve one, maybe two maximum serves not perfect, you’re right away in trouble, which on a slower court is not going to happen that quickly.
So I feel probably a bit more confident on a slower court against a normal player. Against top guys, they can also play very well on the faster courts as well.â€
Source:
http://www.tennis-x.com/xblog/2014-01-04/14452.php
This was said in a context with avoiding upsets in mind, however, the smaller margins apply to a fast claycourt too. Players with decent topspin like Guga and Mantilla made Fed look like a clown.
Guga Straight setted Fed both at RG and Indian wells, which is hard court, what a surprise, Fed could beat him only in Hamburg, and in 3 sets.
We've had many discussions about this on various sites and 3-4 of the most knowledgable and neutral posters said that Fed had more time to prepare for his strokes on slow clay. The only knowledgable poster who said something different was Action Jackson, he said that the most important thing was the footing, there may be a grain of truth in that even though Guga beat Roger at IW in straights too which again indicates the first theory is more likely truer.
Very logical too btw, killer topspin with smaller margin= suckage, also on clay you have to put spin on your shot otherwise your shots will be weakfarts. You can't play ping-pong on clay lol. I guess only the most dedicated Fedtards can't accept this simple fact.
About the WTF,
not much to add, the icing on the Fedtard cake, a tourney which has the most blatant tankings, to the extent it's almost unwatchable and where only players who go for rankings care about giving a half-assed effort. Just lol!