I know you're in the anti-Kyrgios camp, but don't be so melodramatic. Look, either, Kyrgios is going to do it, or he isn't. But, even if you think he's over-rated, do you really think he's that untalented?
My friend Moxie! Sorry but you are almost 100% mistaken here. I am
not in the anti-Kyrgios camp. As I put in other posts, my main difference with the Kyrgios "believers" is what I think his strengths and weaknesses are. I even like his attitude now. So, I don't think he is overrated, I think he is wrongly rated.
We discussed this in other threads already, anyway. From those discussions, I learned that I can expand my original conception of "talent", which was more based on "skill". But anyway, Kyrgios limited skill set in a way limits his talent. And be sure I can use data to support that.
I simply cannot say that a guy who has so limited ground shots as "supremely talented". Look, I would not trade MY forehand with his. I can tell you the names of dozens of unheralded top 50 guys who can control the ball much better than him -- but they simply lack the firepower. Take Kyrgio's firepower away and he is done.
But now comes the part were I defend him: I think he has a future because he has so much room for improvement,
and he has the mindset. Again, opposed the vast majority of posters, I think his head is an asset and not a liability. He stays cool on big moments, in a way a very few can do. Also, he has no fear to try different things. He is a different animal and surely, as Scoop once posted some time ago, he is a very good thing to tennis (if he lifts off).
And by the way I simply don't buy this "I don't love tennis" thing neither from him or anybody else. Take tennis away from these people and you will see them screaming to be back in two weeks.
P.S. You were right about the melodrama -- I am generally guilty of that, but not in this case...