Djokovic turned pro in 2003. 2011 was 8 years later. 8 years since then is the beginning of next season. I doubt he'll play another 8 years, so, yes, that is around his early-middle career. Whenever I have asked you to give me a reason that Nadal would dope, you've always said something limp about tennis being lucrative and fame being alluring. Which, as I have said applies then to everyone in tennis as a motivation. Yet, when you have Djokovic, in a 3-year drought at Majors and stuck beneath the Fedal glass ceiling, you're fine with the gluten-free diet explanation. And when Roger takes off 7 months and then comes back almost immediately to win a major after 4.5 years without one, you're fine with the R&R explanation and the stronger backhand, after all of those years, and at 35. As I have said, I can buy those explanations, too, but when you're looking at motivations, you don't apply a very logical or fair standard for all players. Djokovic would have been frustrated by his lack of results, and Federer, later, would have been looking at Nadal and Djokovic threatening to eclipse his Major count, but the only motivation you buy into is Nadal's wanting fame & money, even though at 16, 17 and 18 he was already having very good results. Your reasoning is your own eye test that he had a very buff body, and a lot of stamina...not really that outrageous in a young man and a professional athlete, I might add. BTW, this is a part of your argument I never get: you said that later he slimmed down. So when, by your estimation, did he stop doping? And if you believe he did, how is it that he still wins Majors and other big titles? You never seem to buy the idea that he slimmed down a bit to take pressure off the knees. You also don't seem to see that he's still pretty buff.
All I've ever asked you to do is to apply the same standards to all players when you're going to accuse doping. You don't. And when I make compelling arguments for you re: Nadal, you blithely ignore them and go on making accusations. I really don't care what you go on believing in your own biased brain, but when you keep making the same false claims in public, I will fight you. If you can't see that your standards are wildly unfair and disproportionately handed out, then hopefully others, at least, will.
:cuckoo: 
