I agree that vaccine mandates are extreme, and can seem draconian, to some, but to assume that others, especially those in power and with great access to information are "uninformed" is stacking the deck in your favor. And I think it's overly simple. Where we absolutely agree is in that there should be much more transparency. And it's criminal that this has been so politicized, but that horse left the barn long ago.
It’s a couple of times you used the word “uninformed” in quotes when replying to me, in relation to politicians, but I’m not sure I used that word. You used it first about the EU President, and my argument is that she’s not listening to people if she decides to force them to take a vaccine. Now as we know, legally she can’t do this, but the EU is a slippery institution and it isn’t beyond them to introduce penalties and restrictions to errant nations who won’t obey them.
What happens over here unfortunately is that although they have access to a lot of information, they only recite a list of treatments and approaches that are not necessarily suited to everyone, and are largely driven by big pharma (vaccines) and social restrictions. So they maybe very well informed, but they’re not sharing the full extent of information that will help us combat covid on a personal level, which I’ll come to in a second because I’m going to give a little defence of the official approach before I argue against myself and this defence.
It’s understandable, if you have to lead hundreds of millions of people, that they should take this approach. How can they afford to treat everyone as an exception - which we all are - when the disease is spreading? I can forgive them for saying, “look, we don’t have time to listen to everyone, this virus is rampant!
So let’s issue the vaccines rapidly, keep your distance, follow the restrictions, we’re firefighting, FFS!”
I can accept this and sympathise with it, to a large extent. They don’t have many other practical options. Although with imaginative and bright politicians and they can still do this better. The Irish experience of the last 20 months is that they instantly reach for the blunt force instrument of severe restriction and this festers huge resentment, and resistance. They don’t think, perhaps restrict regions differently according to their population differences, for example but we have many areas of complaint over here, when we factor in incompetence and hypocrisy in our leaders, and we don’t have all day.
But never, not once, in their broadcasts do they ever mention personal responsibility for your health, to exercise more, to get out and get some vitamin d, build your immune system through better diet, supplements, exercise etc. Give yourself a better chance. They’re selling this mono culture of ideas and it’s just wrong. We don’t only have to rely on drugs and restrictions, we have an immune system that is largely beating the virus without assistance. This is statistical. Most people by far who catch covid are okay, with only mild symptoms.
This borders on the judgmental. Front has been hitting the age/overweight thing pretty hard. It's also kind of old news. You do realize that new variants have also been hitting younger, healthier populations. Could be many factors, but it is true.
So this is where we come to the dying
from or dying
with part. It’s a tricky one, because it’s a bit like the chicken and egg. Would a 90 year old career-smoker have died on that same day if they hasn’t had Covid? Who can tell, but it seems unlikely. But it seems equally unlikely that they’d have died with covid if they were twenty years young and healthy.
This is always an emotional topic, and everyone knows for example that among the most vulnerable in our society are those in nursing homes. My own dad was in one, and it was heartbreaking to visit him, while at the same time it was the best part of my week. In Ireland, our health honcho suggested last year that it would be “heartless” to stop the residents from having visitors during the pandemic, going against the advice and wishes and fears of the nursing homes, who wanted to restrict visits for a while.
The result was inevitable, and so covid got into the homes and the largest percent of fatalities in Ireland came from the nursing homes. Now, it’s a brutal and tragic fact, but had the residents all been young and healthy the result would be different. This is just the awful truth. This is why the nursing homes wanted to restrict visitors, because they knew this. My dad was in his nursing home because he had Alzheimers and we couldn’t look after him at home. He clung on for a year in the home, and for a long time he was just lying there, barely able to draw breath, but alive. Had he caught covid, or had he overheard a car backfiring and got a fright, there would be no difference. The problem was that he was already dying.
Most people in nursing homes are old and frail and with fewer immunity weapons than the young buck on the football team and we’d be negligent and dishonest if we pretended that Covid affects everyone equally.
Covid is largely a disease which is killing people with co-morbidities and compromised immunity. Most deaths are occurring in countries with larger obesity rates. This isn’t being judgmental. In America you have that ideas that it’s “fat shaming” to say that being fat is unhealthy. But unfortunately it’s an indicator for getting a worse dose of covid.
The CDC said that “Adults with excess weight are at even greater risk during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/obesity-and-covid-19.html
Johns Hopkins university and WHO show that most deaths are occurring in countries with the highest obesity rates:
Taking data from over 160 countries, the report found linear correlations between a country’s covid-19 mortality and the proportion of adults that are overweight. There is not a single example of a country with less than 40% of the population overweight that has high death rates (over 10 per 100 000), the report said. Similarly, no country with a death rate over 100 per 100 000 had less than 50% of their population overweight.
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n623
It may sound heartless but this is also The Science, and I hope that since covid hit, we all tried to see how we can improve our own health to give us a better chance, because it matters.
Many doctors on the front lines say unvaccinated patients in their 20s and 30s are becoming more severely ill, and more quickly. But comprehensive data is lacking.
www.nytimes.com
Unfortunately, I can’t open the link, it’s behind a paywall, but I see the data isn’t too comprehensive.
I did say it wasn't you that has no interest in my POV. It's basically everyone else. Occasionally I get a nod, but mostly this is a thread for the vaccine hesitant, and those that think the governments and big Pharma are shoving something poisonous down everyone's throat/arm. I will just pick my battles.
Well, like I say, it’s the prevailing culture so it has to be questioned, especially when it’s affecting so many lives. Like I said above, I can see good reason for a one-size-fits-all approach, but it doesn’t necessarily fly in societies with so much information available (not always a good thing), and which are used to more freedom in their choices.
We’re venting here but it’s good we can. And we’re not only sharing the official line that we’re being hammered with daily on the news, but hopefully sharing equally expert opinions that we’ve sourced in good faith. I don’t always believe that governments act in good faith, or honesty, with regards to this disease.
Like you, I'm lucky enough to take no medicines, and I avoid them at all option. I trust a lot in my own healthy body, a good diet, etc. However, for example, I take a flu shot every year. Not because I'm afraid that I will get the flu, but to protect those who are more vulnerable to it, and could die from catching it: the very old, the very young, and the immune-compromised. Same with the Covid vaccine. I'm not afraid for myself, but I'm willing to protect others.
I agree with this approach, that we use the data available and make our own choices, based on what’s good for us, and others. We’d hope that everyone does due process on this thing and arrives at a place where they’re similarly taking responsibility for themselves, even if it’s not all in the same way. I know people in my close circle who are terrified of covid, they do everything the government suggests without question, they get angry at others who ask questions - and they continue with their own old bad habits of too much alcohol, bad diet, no exercise, and cigarettes, and I shake my head. Especially smoking, given that the virus targets the lungs, but maybe among heavy smokers the damage is already done. However, I believe that psychologically we give ourselves a boost when we take responsibility for ourselves, healthwise.
You're right to say that the vaccinated have a statistically better chance of having a lighter case, and also, (not sure if you said this, but I will,) statistically are less likely too spread it.
(Something I don't think
@Front242 believes.) Even in the presence of virus, it tends to fall off faster in the vaccinated, thereby limiting the spread.
I didn’t know that the vaccine reduces transmission, but I haven’t read anything that contradicts this either. I was curious about it. That’s a good thing.
I realize that you and Front are not one person, and I will take up some of my issues with him.
Yes, though we’re both Irish and love many of the same films, I had hoped that long ago people had realised that me and Front are not the same person
But I do share a huge amount of his concerns about governments approaches to this, the reliance and insistence on big pharma, especially the growing feebleness of the vaccine over short periods, and the downplaying of the role of taking personal responsibility for our health.