mrzz
Hater
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 6,172
- Reactions
- 2,999
- Points
- 113
You hold a high standard, but I don't agree. Roger has shown a huge amount of respect for the game, and paid a lot of dues in. I also recently made the point that there is a loop-hole whereby he can get an invitation into the next Olympics without having played DC, and some Fed fans disagreed with that. They say play by the same rules. Imho, Roger has paid a lot, A LOT of service to the game, and whatever keeps him in it, I'm down with that. And I say this as one who doesn't want to see him fresh for Wimbledon, as a partisan. There's a lot of grind in the tennis game. If you don't agree that, at some point, some have earned a few "get out of jail free" cards, then you risk losing them. There actually are provisions whereby X number of years played and matches played allows for X number of tournaments to be skipped. It's not a cheat or disrespect of the game. That's actually the game respecting the player's service.
Well, one thing is what you say and other what you do, but anyway I am not discrediting what he already did. Point is that he has to realize that right now his popularity is insanely huge -- I don't think there is ever another tennis player that popular, so if he snubs a major, it could have consequences. Maybe he is underestimating his own importance.