He’s becoming the Davydenko of his generation: playing a lot of tournaments, and consistently doing well enough to stay in the Top 10., but rarely holding the trophy.
I’n not a huge fan of the crown prince and I know what you mean regarding his actual results, but IMO Davydenko was both better and worse than Tsitsipas.
Davydenko I think of as a classic overachiever whereas the naturally talented Tsitspas I think of as a classic underachiever.
Niikolay had no overpowering weapons, was a hardworking consistent player who “looked” like journeyman but had good results , hit the ball on the rise like Agassi and hit flat groundies. In his career he won 21 out of 28 tournament finals, including 3 Masters and 1 YE ATP. Whereas Tsitsipas is 9 out of 26.
OTOH, of those 2 are Masters and 1 YE ATP, and Stefano has actually reached 2 Major finals which Davydenko never could do, Davydenko was a perennial QF & occasional SF so maybe Davydenko squeezed as much as he could of his talent whereas Tsitsipas has squandered so much of his.
But yeah, in big matches Davydenko like Tsitsipas had a hard time not folding. Had Federer on the ropes in a one Slam and just couldn’t do it.