Not happening. Not just he will not win slams on any surfaces aside clay, but he will not be clay king either.Is it just me or does anyone think D.thiem is the next Nadal A player that's going to start by winning the FO then go on and dominate the sport later in he's career. D.thiem slam record could look something like this. AO- 1title. FO- 6 titles . WC- 1title. USO- 3 titles
Herios I Disagree Nadal the only one that's better than D.Thiem on clay right now. but then Nadal retires No one will be good a enough to stop thiem. Also did you see that thiem did to djokovic last year at the FO I have ever seen djokovic get beaten down that badly. And thiem one of the best movers on the court right now.Not happening. Not just he will not win slams on any surfaces aside clay, but he will not be clay king either.
Is it just me or does anyone think D.thiem is the next Nadal A player that's going to start by winning the FO then go on and dominate the sport later in he's career. D.thiem slam record could look something like this. AO- 1title. FO- 6 titles . WC- 1title. USO- 3 titles
Well, up till now I guess I was the greatest "believer" in Thiem around here but "new Nadal" is surely too much. What I think is that he is by very far the best clay courter of the younger players and the only guy I can have a relative confidence will reach #1 and win multiple majors. He surely won't show the same kind of dominance the big three has shown, but no one will anyway.
Thinking that a new Nadal is coming up on his heels is ridiculous. I like Thiem. I think he's sturdy. But I don't think there will be a King of Clay to replace Nadal in the near future. It took 30 years for Nadal to replace Borg. Thiem is the most promising on clay, for now, until Djokovic comes back. But I do think he has promise on other surfaces, too.Well, up till now I guess I was the greatest "believer" in Thiem around here but "new Nadal" is surely too much. What I think is that he is by very far the best clay courter of the younger players and the only guy I can have a relative confidence will reach #1 and win multiple majors. He surely won't show the same kind of dominance the big three has shown, but no one will anyway.
Is that the some as Nadal Already great on clay thiem semis FO 16, 17. And promising on other surfaces thiem already better than djokovic on clay he rolled over djokovic in straight sets last year FO. I have never seen djokovic get beaten down that badly on clay that was awesome. Plus thiem is one of the best movers on court right now he is also better than baby fed.Thinking that a new Nadal is coming up on his heels is ridiculous. I like Thiem. I think he's sturdy. But I don't think there will be a King of Clay to replace Nadal in the near future. It took 30 years for Nadal to replace Borg. Thiem is the most promising on clay, for now, until Djokovic comes back. But I do think he has promise on other surfaces, too.
A good bit of that was incomprehensible to me, sorry. But Thiem couldn't beat Djokovic and Nadal in a row, two tournaments running. He may be the next best clay player when Rafa is done, but he will never be the next King of Clay. I think we can make book on that. The next Great clay courter is surely a player-to-be-named-later.Is that the some as Nadal Already great on clay thiem semis FO 16, 17. And promising on other surfaces thiem already better than djokovic on clay he rolled over djokovic in straight sets last year FO. I have never seen djokovic get beaten down that badly on clay that was awesome. Plus thiem is one of the best movers on court right now he is also better than baby fed.
Well I think D.thiem will Make the FO final this year losing to Nadal. Also Thiem is clearly Already better than Federer on clay and more a complete player than baby fed, also all the other next gen players. Well maybe not the Aussie nick.Kygios but rest of the next gen far better.
OK so you said that thiem is only good on one Surface then I said you are right for now. But I never said thiem was not the next king of clay which he is or that Federer would beat thiem. I was talking about the other surfaces not clay. I still think Thiem is the awesome on clay but I only said thiem would beat federer because he's really rusty on clay but if Federer plays he's best then yes he would beat thiem. I guess it is just me then it comes it thiemUmmm, no. You're a weird chap, in one sentence you acknowledge Thiem is no world beater and in the next one he'd destroy Federer. Yes, even Roger at 36 and rusty on clay would probably take Thiem.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
J | If back in 2018… | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 36 | |
BMW Open 2018, Munich, Germany, ATP 250 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 53 | ||
Top 10 1990-2018 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 0 | ||
The best points of 2018 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 20 | ||
What was your favorite shot of 2018? | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 11 |