What on Earth is going on in the world today? It's gone mad

[JesuslookslikeBorg]

bloody hell some bloke called juan morel in tiny red knickers :s (with old spice surfer advert music circa 1979) is bursting out of my screen.

looks a bit alarming..and he had a mental grin on his face when he was doing his routine. :speechless:

 

[JesuslookslikeBorg]

ok..lolwut, mr kai green needs to sort out a) his hairdo and b) his spangly panties. :s

the muscles are very very big and the panties are very very tiny. I think i'll leave the action now.:idea:

 

[Front242]

Well Olympia 2014 is going on right now if that counts as a world event

Stream here http://streaming.bodybuilding.com/2014-olympia-webcast/?clickid=Vkh2pnVKH0wN2GYwltXDUVUSUkQWkIUbgxwM1E0&irpid=58929

is bodybuilding comps under the WADA antidrugs umbrella ?..

was it a drugs free for all in the late 1970s when arnie and lou farrago (pre hulk:snigger) were competing ?, although I suppose not many performance enhancing drugs were around all those years ago :huh: or were theaa any drug tests at all ?.:idea:

They all used steroids back then. These days it's mostly HGH so hence why bodybuilders imo look terrible these days compare to the 70's because the HGH gives them huge protruding pregnant looking bellies. The GH gut as it's known is caused because HGH causes all your organs to grow so the organs especially in the stomach expand like crazy. It's a horrible look and these guys will likely have huge fat bellies for life after they stop.

Fitness models though go more for Tren (Trenbolone) which burns fat at the same ratio as building muscle without the need for much cardio. If you see guys like the ones in this video, most likely this is what they're taking.

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nadgnU8h0B8&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

 

[Kieran]

I find the threats being made on Emma Watson to be both frightening and disgusting. I think we've gone too liberal in the western world, and the internet is the price we pay. The notion that peoples privacy can be intruded on, bartered with, and gloated over, is stomach churning. This is common, when we see illegal downloads of music, books, and films, which are destroying old industries, and it isn't a far leap from this to think that nothing is private, nothing has ownership, so long as it can be accessed on the web. There's no policing the internet, or little, and it's a huge problem.

From Emma Watson's perspective, and the idea that these trolls have suggested they'll "punish her" for a feminist speech she made at the UN, this is doubly appalling. Firstly, because they've taken away her right to privacy, and secondly because they're most likely politically illiterate numbskulls without a soul, who wouldn't know how to properly scan her speech if it downloaded on them like a ton of bricks.

I think the public "shaming" of these celebrities should be reversed, and the shame should be on any of us who hunt for the photos. There are many good reasons why we shouldn't participate in feeding the trolls, but these things are a result of the society we made for ourselves. I like the female form, but I also have a wife, sisters, a mother, friends, aunts, and I don't like the notion that their privacy is at stake and they can be attacked and humiliated in this way. :nono

 

[shawnbm]

Hear, hear, ... the right honourable gentleman from Dublin has the floor (damnation they aren't part of the kingdom--and they took our Guinness with them ...)

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

I agree %100 with Kieran, but I would like to add something. Nobody will ever post a nude picture of me online...not only because it is not that appealing, but because it just does not exist in any digital platform. I do not understand why these people take their nude pics and keep it in their cell phones or instagram or whatever... What is the point? If we want to talk about privacy, which I am a big believer in, we must show at least the minimum effort, no? It starts with NOT taking nude selfies and sending it to your girl/boyfriend via internet.

 

[Kieran]

Well, that's true, Murat, although I think we'd agree that whatever they get up to privately is their own thing, nothing they intend to be made public. This is the hideous part, because whatever's between them and their partners, these trolls have violated it, humiliated them and dragged them out in public.

I don't understand the Internet so well. I mean, hackers can attack banks and government agencies, but this can't be done in reverse? Is there nobody in the FBI can track and identify the source of these invasions, and have them caught? Or at least, hack into their site and shut it down? Meantime, I'm sure that every celeb who took a naughty selfie in the bathroom is hitting delete and living in fear that it's too late...

 

[Moxie]

Well, that's true, Murat, although I think we'd agree that whatever they get up to privately is their own thing, nothing they intend to be made public. This is the hideous part, because whatever's between them and their partners, these trolls have violated it, humiliated them and dragged them out in public.

I don't understand the Internet so well. I mean, hackers can attack banks and government agencies, but this can't be done in reverse? Is there nobody in the FBI can track and identify the source of these invasions, and have them caught? Or at least, hack into their site and shut it down? Meantime, I'm sure that every celeb who took a naughty selfie in the bathroom is hitting delete and living in fear that it's too late...

It is very right that we shouldn't blame the victim of privacy invasion, which is criminal, for nothing more than carelessness, which is a human frailty. That said, it's sometimes surprising what people let exist out there, given how much we're all cautioned to guard our private information (of all kinds,) especially people with a public profile.

I have an idea for a new business: scrubbing celebrity devices of incriminating photos!

 

[GameSetAndMath]

Well, that's true, Murat, although I think we'd agree that whatever they get up to privately is their own thing, nothing they intend to be made public. This is the hideous part, because whatever's between them and their partners, these trolls have violated it, humiliated them and dragged them out in public.

I don't understand the Internet so well. I mean, hackers can attack banks and government agencies, but this can't be done in reverse? Is there nobody in the FBI can track and identify the source of these invasions, and have them caught? Or at least, hack into their site and shut it down? Meantime, I'm sure that every celeb who took a naughty selfie in the bathroom is hitting delete and living in fear that it's too late...

It is very right that we shouldn't blame the victim of privacy invasion, which is criminal, for nothing more than carelessness, which is a human frailty. That said, it's sometimes surprising what people let exist out there, given how much we're all cautioned to guard our private information (of all kinds,) especially people with a public profile.

I have an idea for a new business: scrubbing celebrity devices of incriminating photos!

What business? I will do it for free of cost, just ask them to handover the devices to me.

 

[Billie]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/400-bodies-found-in-ukraine-mass-graves-are-evidence-of-war-crime-lavrov/5405631?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=400-bodies-found-in-ukraine-mass-graves-are-evidence-of-war-crime-lavrov

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Wednesday that more than 400 bodies have been discovered in mass graves near the city of Donetsk in eastern Ukraine, in what he described as “horrific” evidence that pointed to a war crime.


“This is obviously a war crime. Already more than 400 bodies have been discovered in [mass] graves outside Donetsk and we hope that western capitals will not hush up these facts [because] they’re horrific,” Lavrov said, adding there was an apparent blackout of the incident in Western mass media.

Last week, several mass graves filled with bodies of massacred civilians and independence supporters, killed execution-style, were unearthed 35 kilometers northeast of Donetsk.


“I expect [to hear] a clear, unbiased and responsible response from international organizations. OSCE is already working at the scene. We will make the truth known and, of course, make sure that the justice is done,” Sergei Lavrov said at a press conference.

Speaking at PACE’s fall session in Strasbourg on Tuesday, Russian lawmaker Olga Kazakova called on the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe to keep an eye on the investigation into this horrendous massacre.

The independence supporters of southeastern Ukraine believe that the civilians were murdered by the National Guard fighters who had stayed in the village of Nyzhnia Krynka, near the city of Donetsk, where the graves had been discovered, since April. Ukrainian authorities later denied this accusation, saying that not a single National Guard fighter had been in the area, adding however that some other Ukrainian units were deployed there at the time.

Lavrov commented on Kiev’s recent claim to conduct an open and impartial probe of the alleged massacre as soon as it regained control of the area, saying it was pure hypocrisy because “these crimes were obviously perpetrated there at the time when Ukrainian security forces were in control of this region.”


I actually read this news from several different sources and apparently the Russians have some people in their capture, people that are suspected of committing these crimes, there are survivors and witnesses as well. Let's see how the West is going to try to hush this.

 

[tented]

"Texas Says That Up to 100 Are at Risk of Ebola Exposure"

Did anyone ever see the film Contagion?

 

[Kieran]

What do you's think of the US Navy Seal Robert O'Neill breaking silence on killing Bin Laden?

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

I am guessing Ferguson is not going to have a quiet night for the foreseeable future...

 

[shawnbm]

It is despicable and an embarrassment to our nation, murat. It angers me so that hoodlums take the opportunity to trash people's businesses and homes--their lives--as an alleged "protest" to the system doing what it is supposed to do--MANY WHILE COVERING THEIR FACES AS THEY COMMIT THEIR ACTS OF "PROTEST"!!!!!

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

It is not like they are discriminating either, when they are burning up businesses. I am sure there a lot of black owned establishments there too.

The anger is understandable, I get it. The way to go about showing it though...

One thing is for sure: There was no way ever this case was ever going to be proven in court, with a million conflicting eye witness accounts, so it should not be a huge surprise it did not pass the grand jury phase. But I am a bit conflicted there. Grand jury phase has a very low threshold of proof. It basically asks "could this have happened?" . I think the jurors came back with the decision they did not because it could not have happened, but because it was never going to be possible to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in court. Maybe they looked ahead, which was not their job...

Who knows. I just feel bad for the parents of the kid.

 

[calitennis127]

The anger is understandable, I get it. The way to go about showing it though...

I disagree that the anger is understandable, if you are simply talking about this case. Obama said the same thing as you, and you should question yourself if you ever take the company of such a buffoon.

The prosecutor who laid out the facts and announced the decision is a Democrat. The conclusion was reached after painstaking review of the evidence. In a court of law, feelings do not matter. That's why law is boring to me. It isn't about attitudes or philosophy or psychology. It's about whether crime was committed or not. Nothing more, nothing less. There isn't time for emotions in a courtroom.

This rioting lunacy has been entirely fed by the white leftist media and leftist education establishment, whose worldview is based on lies.

There is nothing productive in complaining of racism in this situation, because there isn't even much of a debate. You don't rob a store and then reach into a police officer's car, grab his gun, and tell him that he is too much of a pu**y to ever shoot you with it and not expect to be told to get on the ground. If you refuse to get on the ground at that point and you start running at the police officer, then there is a good chance you will be met with deadly force.

Racism is a reality, but a case like this is a silly and trivial example to bring up and it does more harm than good in addressing actual racism. However, you can't expect the white leftist establishment to ever face up to that, because they have replaced Christianity with their own religion of antiracism, with MLK replacing Jesus Christ as the perfect exemplar of virtue, and the tenets of the new faith cannot be rationally questioned. They must be accepted blindly. Facts and reason do not matter.

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

The anger is understandable, I get it. The way to go about showing it though...

I disagree that the anger is understandable, if you are simply talking about this case. Obama said the same thing as you, and you should question yourself if you ever take the company of such a buffoon.

I always question myself brother.

I wasn't simply talking about just this case, that's why anger is understandable. There are deeper issues, as you know, and moments like these are like the steam coming out of a pressure cooker.

 

[calitennis127]

It is despicable and an embarrassment to our nation, murat. It angers me so that hoodlums take the opportunity to trash people's businesses and homes--their lives--as an alleged "protest" to the system doing what it is supposed to do--MANY WHILE COVERING THEIR FACES AS THEY COMMIT THEIR ACTS OF "PROTEST"!!!!!

Don't blame the hoodlums. Blame the white leftists who feed this narrative of abominable white racism as a way of finding moral fulfillment for themselves as they vigorously displace the religion (Christianity) that made their civilization.

One misconception about an episode like Trayvon Martin's death or Michael Brown's death is that the whole political brouhaha has anything at all to do with black people. It does not. This whole conversation is fundamentally about white Westerners arguing among themselves about how they want their civilization to function. This is made obvious by the fact that white leftists are clearly indifferent to the massive black-on-black homicide problem in black communities; they don't care about those cases because they have nothing to do with vilifying traditional Western civilization.

For the white left, it doesn't matter what happens in the world if there isn't a white person to vilify in the narrative. Four hundred blacks can be shot by other blacks. Doesn't matter. One black is shot by a white and it is a world news story. Why? Because it can be used to reinforce the narrative of supposed post-Christian moral progress.

 

[calitennis127]

The anger is understandable, I get it. The way to go about showing it though...

I disagree that the anger is understandable, if you are simply talking about this case. Obama said the same thing as you, and you should question yourself if you ever take the company of such a buffoon.

I always question myself brother.

I wasn't simply talking about just this case, that's why anger is understandable. There are deeper issues, as you know, and moments like these are like the steam coming out of a pressure cooker.

Of course, but a case like this is not what should initiate those broader conversations. It so plain-as-day that there isn't even a debate to be had.

 

[Murat Baslamisli]

I disagree that the anger is understandable, if you are simply talking about this case. Obama said the same thing as you, and you should question yourself if you ever take the company of such a buffoon.

I always question myself brother.

I wasn't simply talking about just this case, that's why anger is understandable. There are deeper issues, as you know, and moments like these are like the steam coming out of a pressure cooker.

Of course, but a case like this is not what should initiate those broader conversations. It so plain-as-day that there isn't even a debate to be had.

I agree. Nothing productive comes out of situations like this one anyways. But like I said, the steam has to be let out and when the dust settles, conversation has to start. Hopefully an honest one.