OMG, you never stop making it about politics. 1.) I wasn't the director, so it wasn't my interview. 2.) We were talking to a surgeon, not a politician, so none of that was germane to the conversation about his hospital. 3.) It had nothing to do with his politics. It was about his real experiences of it on the ground, you compassionless moron.
Well I have spoken to other healthcare professionals about their experiences with "Covid." The problem I ran in to is that neither they nor their colleagues had much experience with it because their hospitals hardly had any "Covid" patients. So I can match my anecdotes with yours any day.
If you could pull your head about of Trump's a$$ for just long enough to see that there has been real suffering, and admit that, then maybe you wouldn't come off as such a C U next Tuesday.
I have acknowledged all along that the virus is real, especially as a threat to the elderly. But I have also said that its dangers have been ridiculously exaggerated to serve anti-Trump political ends, which is absolutely the case. I stand by that assessment.
Now when it comes to suffering, it is rather comical for you to be condemning me for not showing compassion when I have been the only one on this board to talk about the suffering of old people in your state of New Slavetrader, I mean New York (and, btw, the story just broke today that the New York Times was originally owned by a family that owned slaves. Perhaps that is one cancellation you and I can agree on now!). But why don't you talk about the suffering of the elderly in New York? Because it would bring attention to the incompetence of your political party.
Instead, cover your eyes and ears, you harden that lump of coal that substitutes for your heart, and you regurgitate Trump talking points.
I could only wish that the Trump administration was in line with my views on the "Covid" issue. If they had my attitude they would simply be laughing at the New York Times and Washington Post and most of the country would be functioning normally and prosperously. And old people would be protected. It would be great.
Keep selling your soul for a political agenda. See where that gets you, Mr. bible-citer. I thought you had some fear for your immortal soul.
LMFAO.....this one really got me laughing. I have to give you credit. That was funny, Moxie. Albeit unintentionally, but funny nonetheless.
What's hilarious about this is that when Buttigieg was running for president and he cited Scripture 70,000 times to justify his idiotic positions, you NEVER even one time condemned him for doing that. Nor have you condemned Pelosi for citing the Bible and her Catholic faith as justification for her political positions. (Not to mention how many times MLK and Obama quoted the Bible.) And then one time - only one time - I cite Scripture as a retort to your remark about Trump and Ivanka, and you flip out and call me "Mr. Bible-Citer." So what now? Referring to one widely known part of the Bible makes you a Biblical fundamentalist?
All I was doing was pointing out the irony in you expressing a very Biblical prejudice against incest while at the same time ignoring the Bible when it comes to homosexuality, even though Leviticus condemns the two side by side. Oh, but I forgot, you called incest "gross." Well up until about 10 minutes ago, 99.9999% of the human race (including and especially Muslims and non-whites) thought homosexuality was gross too. So don't you have any other argument to offer against incest, Mrs. Bible-Prejudice Sharer?
You can always peruse some quotes from Buttigieg citing the Bible if you need to.