US Politics Thread
- Thread starter britbox
- Start date
You must have been classified as a harlot of Beelzebub,Clearly I don't "believe" either. still can't see it
tented
Administrator
Right, like @Federberg I can see some but not all embedded videos, while others can see them. Random.
That could be potentially quite interesting in itself. Worthy of an experiment at least.
Federberg
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 15,555
- Reactions
- 5,629
- Points
- 113
I may have been using my Mac. If that's the case the VPN was on. I'll try my PC and see if that changes anything
What country was your original VPN set to? and can you see the second video too (without VPN)?
Federberg
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 15,555
- Reactions
- 5,629
- Points
- 113
Moxie
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,660
- Reactions
- 14,826
- Points
- 113
Only a few days ago, I thought Trump had cooked his own goose and was done. He's back in the game.
That's not the attitude dumbass. The issue is whether the disease is severe enough that the global economy should be shut down with all the problems that is causing and can cause in the future. But that is a question you can't even ask because your white left-wing slavemasters in Western Europe have told you to think differently. Whatever they tell you to believe, you believe unquestioningly. They are your goods. They give you your religion. And you believe in it very fanatically.
Hey Federbergy…..take a look at this news which is sliding under the radar because of the virus you have a childish obsession with. Looks like you and your dumbo brother tented were the ones believing in a tinfoil conspiracy theory all along about Russian meddling and collusion between Trump and Russia. What's it feel like to have been so completely wrong?
Look, everyone, at how superstitious and wrong Federberg and tented-the-dumb-little-beaver were. But we know that BwokenBoy won't stop looking up to them as his idols because white Western European leftists (and their clones in the United States) are his gods. He trusts every word they say. Every last one.
Justice Department Dropping Case Against 2 Russian Companies Charged in Mueller Probe
time.com
Look, everyone, at how superstitious and wrong Federberg and tented-the-dumb-little-beaver were. But we know that BwokenBoy won't stop looking up to them as his idols because white Western European leftists (and their clones in the United States) are his gods. He trusts every word they say. Every last one.
Justice Department Dropping Case Against 2 Russian Companies Charged in Mueller Probe
DOJ Drops Case Against 2 Russian Companies Charged by Mueller
Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering were among three companies and 13 individuals charged in 2018 by special counsel Robert Mueller
Federberg
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 15,555
- Reactions
- 5,629
- Points
- 113
lol! You absolute fucking moron! In what way were we proved wrong...Hey Federbergy…..take a look at this news which is sliding under the radar because of the virus you have a childish obsession with. Looks like you and your dumbo brother tented were the ones believing in a tinfoil conspiracy theory all along about Russian meddling and collusion between Trump and Russia. What's it feel like to have been so completely wrong?
Look, everyone, at how superstitious and wrong Federberg and tented-the-dumb-little-beaver were. But we know that BwokenBoy won't stop looking up to them as his idols because white Western European leftists (and their clones in the United States) are his gods. He trusts every word they say. Every last one.
Justice Department Dropping Case Against 2 Russian Companies Charged in Mueller Probe
DOJ Drops Case Against 2 Russian Companies Charged by Mueller
Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering were among three companies and 13 individuals charged in 2018 by special counsel Robert Mueller
"Prosecutors said they concluded that a trial, against a corporate defendant with no presence in the United States and no prospect of meaningful punishment even if convicted, would likely expose sensitive law enforcement tools and techniques, “potentially undermining their effectiveness.”"
Does it say anything about the charges being incorrect? Errrr.. no! Good grief you're a retard
It's implied if you look at the context, which your misinformed ass clearly doesn't understand.
Here is the point about those charges: they generated a lot of media hype and convinced sapheads like yourself that Russian collusion was a reality, but the Mueller team did not even know if they were true and most of all they knew they would never have to prove the charges in court. In other words, they did it simply to generate media hype while knowing full well that in the long run their case would never be proven or have to be proven.
Here is former US prosecutor Andy McCarthy explaining it. Enjoy, and be polite when you respond. Otherwise Daisy will have to hit you with that paddle:
"So why did Team Mueller publicly file an indictment against Russians?
Because they figured it was a freebie. The prosecutors assumed that they would never have to . . . you know . . . prove the case. The Russian defendants were in Russia. There was no way Putin would ever extradite them for an American criminal trial. The prosecutors knew that. What they wrote was not meant to be a real indictment. It was meant to be a press release. It was meant to be what Team Mueller was best at: the spinning of a narrative. I explained it this way at the time:
"When prosecutors are serious about nabbing law-breakers who are at large, they do not file an indictment publicly. That would just induce the offenders to flee to or remain in their safe havens. Instead, prosecutors file their indictment under seal, ask the court to issue arrest warrants, and quietly go about the business of locating and apprehending the defendants charged. In the Russia case, however, the indictment was filed publicly even though the defendants are at large. That is because the Justice Department and the special counsel know the Russians will stay safely in Russia. Mueller’s allegations will never be tested in court. That makes his indictment more a political statement than a charging instrument. To the extent there are questions about whether Russia truly meddled in the election, the special counsel wants to end that discussion."
It all seemed so well choreographed. The indictment was, of course, reported as gospel-truth by the anti-Trump media — the same folks who tell you, whenever a Democrat is charged with a crime, that an indictment is merely an allegation, that nothing is proven until it’s proven in court."
The Inevitable Shoe Drops: DOJ Dismisses Mueller’s Charges against Russian Businesses | National Review
The indictment was political theater never meant to be tried in court.
www.nationalreview.com
Last edited:
Federberg
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 15,555
- Reactions
- 5,629
- Points
- 113
Are you too stupid to realise you're not proving your case? Andy McCarthy makes assumptions about Muellers intentions, there are no facts there. What a great weapon your stubborn retardation is. In your mind you never lose an argument. I almost envy youIt's implied if you look at the context, which your misinformed ass clearly doesn't understand.
Here is the point about those charges: they generated a lot of media hype and convinced sapheads like yourself that Russian collusion was a reality, but the Mueller team did not even know if they were true and most of all they knew they would never have to prove the charges in court. In other words, they did it simply to generate media hype while knowing full well that in the long run their case would never be proven or have to be proven.
Here is former US prosecutor Andy McCarthy explaining it. Enjoy, and be polite when you respond. Otherwise Daisy will have to hit you with that paddle:
"So why did Team Mueller publicly file an indictment against Russians?
Because they figured it was a freebie. The prosecutors assumed that they would never have to . . . you know . . . prove the case. The Russian defendants were in Russia. There was no way Putin would ever extradite them for an American criminal trial. The prosecutors knew that. What they wrote was not meant to be a real indictment. It was meant to be a press release. It was meant to be what Team Mueller was best at: the spinning of a narrative. I explained it this way at the time:
"When prosecutors are serious about nabbing law-breakers who are at large, they do not file an indictment publicly. That would just induce the offenders to flee to or remain in their safe havens. Instead, prosecutors file their indictment under seal, ask the court to issue arrest warrants, and quietly go about the business of locating and apprehending the defendants charged. In the Russia case, however, the indictment was filed publicly even though the defendants are at large. That is because the Justice Department and the special counsel know the Russians will stay safely in Russia. Mueller’s allegations will never be tested in court. That makes his indictment more a political statement than a charging instrument. To the extent there are questions about whether Russia truly meddled in the election, the special counsel wants to end that discussion."
It all seemed so well choreographed. The indictment was, of course, reported as gospel-truth by the anti-Trump media — the same folks who tell you, whenever a Democrat is charged with a crime, that an indictment is merely an allegation, that nothing is proven until it’s proven in court."
The Inevitable Shoe Drops: DOJ Dismisses Mueller’s Charges against Russian Businesses | National Review
The indictment was political theater never meant to be tried in court.
Oh, I absolutely am proving my case. But with non-advanced students like yourself additional explanation is always needed.
Oh the facts are not in question. The charges were filed publicly, not under seal, which is a break with standard prosecutorial process. And they were filed against foreign nationals who the Justice Department had no legal authority to apprehend. Then the charges were ultimately dismissed. There is no doubt at all about that. It is all factual.
That leaves the question of motive behind why the charges would have been brought in the first place against people the Justice Department knew it had no chance of detaining. I'll allow you to think through that one so you can improve your critical thinking skills a little bit. But the answer is quite obvious.
What a great weapon your stubborn retardation is. In your mind you never lose an argument. I almost envy you
Federberg, I am fully aware that in your special-ed circles, shouting at each other when you get irritated is standard practice. But you don't need to bring that to the board. It's clear that you are seeing what is truly YOUR tinfoil conspiracy theory crumble and it is infuriating you. You believe in one silly notion after another - that killing Soleimani will result in widespread assassinations, that someone in the Trump administration would die the night of January 3rd, that Trump colluded with the Kremlin, that the pee tape is real, etc.
The Mueller team brought charges they knew they could not prove and would never have to prove in court. They did this simply to generate media hype for credulous people like you. The charges were ultimately dismissed.
Now you and Tented The Dumb Beaver have to engage in some introspection: why were you deceived? And how could you have fallen so easily for a tinfoil conspiracy theory?
And, for you Federberg, there is one additional question: what will you do with that tinfoil hat you have been wearing for the last 4 years? Will you give it to Daisy perhaps?
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Serious PC thread | World Affairs | 2450 | |
| T | THE EASTERNERS - THE SLAVS thread. | World Affairs | 13 | |
|
|
Russia Politics Thread | World Affairs | 82 | |
|
|
UK Politics Thread | World Affairs | 1004 | |
|
|
Geopolitics in the Middle East | World Affairs | 46 |