I don't know why I even respond to you and the other troll. Do you think I'm campaigning for the notion that Nadal didn't deserve that win? I'm not going to re-debate the whole 2017 US Open with you, and yes, I've been one who has said all along that the top half was the complicated part of the draw. (Which Nadal anchored and Fed was in.) Rublev and Anderson have no point in the conversation. Nadalfan2013 was trying to make out that this tournament, when, as he prematurely asserts, Djokovic wins it, won't be worth as much as a regular Major. I only pointed out to him that there were more top men's players that didn't post in 2017 than haven't made it to this one. MY point is: that doesn't matter. There is a quorum. They show up, and they all have to play a maximum of 7 matches. It's not like if it's only Novak, Rafa, Roger and then a bunch of rhubarbs, even when it feels like that. It's a Major, and it's being played, and whoever wins it will deserve it. Full stop.