The Ultimate FEDAL (Wars) Thread

GameSetAndMath

The GOAT
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
21,141
Reactions
3,398
Points
113
Maybe you should restrict a h2h record to underline your wishes.
They still compete on high levels and play for the biggest titles. Pre-prime, prime and post prime phases are subjective to analyse.
You say roger is in post prime, now he beats Nadal more than loses, should this be excluded? No , he adapted his game. So did Novak and Nadal.

The age difference between Novak and Rafa is so small. So, it is fair to take all the matches into account.

But, Roger being older by above five to six years to the other two, it does not make sense to view the victories of the other two
over Geriatric Roger in a positive light.

However, if Roger wins against the other two, it sure has to be seen in positive light as this means the other two are losing
even to geriatric Roger.
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
22,969
Reactions
3,902
Points
113
The age difference between Novak and Rafa is so small. So, it is fair to take all the matches into account.

But, Roger being older by above five to six years to the other two, it does not make sense to view the victories of the other two
over Geriatric Roger in a positive light.

However, if Roger wins against the other two, it sure has to be seen in positive light as this means the other two are losing
even to geriatric Roger.

Precisely. Can't believe this had to be explained.
 

Bonaca

Major Winner
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
2,114
Reactions
867
Points
113
Perfectly understood..Bonaca. I typically don't watch the WTF but I will this year.. especially watching the genius of Roger, Rafa and Novak.. they're giving all of Us "free" tennis lessons.. especially Roger. I have modeled my one handed by after him.. especially keeping my head still..I destroyed the top player in my league because that clown made all his approach shot short to my backhand..I crucified his arrogant ass.
Thumbs up my friend.
It is obviously That you know what competing is about.
That is also how i am ticking all of my life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the AntiPusher

Bonaca

Major Winner
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
2,114
Reactions
867
Points
113
The age difference between Novak and Rafa is so small. So, it is fair to take all the matches into account.

But, Roger being older by above five to six years to the other two, it does not make sense to view the victories of the other two
over Geriatric Roger in a positive light.

However, if Roger wins against the other two, it sure has to be seen in positive light as this means the other two are losing
even to geriatric Roger.
Haha so Maestro wins no matter what happens, that’s pretty cool.
But you have to admit at least that Geriatric is far over the line. If the age is that significant, how could he became more successful against bull and not against Novak? Could be an indicator that the difference isn’t that important? 5 years in adults are not like 5 years in children.
Anyway I am fine with that. Like I said before, I like Roger a lot. All of them were special and have their records. Let Roger held the slam record, Bull his unreal clay dominance and Novak to reach no1 record and beat both in h2h. Why not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,628
Reactions
14,789
Points
113
In other words, dull has not won anything outside clay without dropping a set and neither has fakervic.

Meanwhile Fed has won Wim 2017, AO 2007(two separate surface slams) without dropping a set. Shows his versatility and GOATness.

I guess you mean HC for Novak? In either case, you don't know that to be so without looking up all of their tournament wins. Of course, Nadal won 2010 USO and only dropped one set...in the final v. Djoker.
 

Nadalfan2013

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
2,768
Reactions
1,426
Points
113
Where did I pretend it was you, I ironically provoked! You still haven’t got it.
Please no luck, I’m hoping only this:
Let them stay healthy, continue to beat the third tire and battle in SF and F against each other as often as possible. Only this and I’m the happiest!
Guess why you genius? ;-):

Since 2017 Nadal won 3 out of his 5 matches with Djokovic. :rolleyes: Anyways I can't wait until Nadal gets his La Decima over Djokovic (10-6) just like he got it over Federer (10-4). It will be hilarious to watch you cry.B-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy22

Bonaca

Major Winner
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
2,114
Reactions
867
Points
113
Since 2017 Nadal won 3 out of his 5 matches with Djokovic. :rolleyes: Anyways I can't wait until Nadal gets his La Decima over Djokovic (10-6) just like he got it over Federer (10-4). It will be hilarious to watch you cry.B-)
You continue to do your poor selective-stats-restriction. Didn’t you wrote yesterday it’s enough? Don’t make a fool out of yourself.
When did you wrote a non-Troll post?
You really can’t believe that I mean what I wrote?
If Bull can win more matches against Novak than lose, I will not be happy, but I will congratulate . That means he is better. Will you vice versa ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

Nadalfan2013

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
2,768
Reactions
1,426
Points
113
You continue to do your poor selective-stats-restriction. Didn’t you wrote yesterday it’s enough? Don’t make a fool out of yourself.
When did you wrote a non-Troll post?
You really can’t believe that I mean what I wrote?
If Bull can win more matches against Novak than lose, I will not be happy, but I will congratulate . That means he is better. Will you vice versa ?

Slam titles are not selective compared to overall titles but slam h2h are selective compared to overall h2h. I see. :cuckoo:
 

Bonaca

Major Winner
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
2,114
Reactions
867
Points
113
Slam titles are not selective compared to overall titles but slam h2h are selective compared to overall h2h. I see. :cuckoo:
How often should I explain it to you topic-Mixer? I talk about their personal rivalry, their matches against each other.
Come on , how poor is : Nadal won 3 out of the last 5 matches??
I could say: Novak won the last 3 slam matches between them, he won 6 of their last 10 slam matches.
I write this only because of your slam- horniness!
Don’t fool around with this selecting shit. It comes back like a boomerang.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

Nadalfan2013

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
2,768
Reactions
1,426
Points
113
Come on , how poor is : Nadal won 3 out of the last 5 matches??
I could say: Novak won the last 3 slam matches between them, he won 6 of their last 10 slam matches.
I write this only because of your slam- horniness!
Don’t fool around with this selecting shit. It comes back like a boomerang.

You & Novak should really get a room. :rose::heart:
 

Bonaca

Major Winner
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
2,114
Reactions
867
Points
113
You & Novak should really get a room. :rose::heart:
I told you, nothing is further to me.:facepalm:
Don’t know what time it is where you live, I have to go now. My two kids wake up early in the morning.
Buenas noches senora
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

Nadalfan2013

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
2,768
Reactions
1,426
Points
113
I told you, nothing is further to me.:facepalm:
Don’t know what time it is where you live, I have to go now. My two kids wake up early in the morning.
Buenas noches senora

Ok. Good night to you and your kids. Please however don't let them watch Novak violently smashing rackets and cursing during some of his matches cause it is not good for your kids to see that. Buenas noches! :bye:
 

brokenshoelace

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
9,380
Reactions
1,334
Points
113
But, Roger being older by above five to six years to the other two, it does not make sense to view the victories of the other two
over Geriatric Roger in a positive light.

I don't get it...if you beat someone ranked number 3 in the world and still competing for major titles...it's supposed to be viewed in a negative light?

You guys really are taking the house money thing to a new extreme. Yeah, I understand why you'd want to praise Roger's victories over these two while diminishing the impact of the times in which they beat him at this point in his career, but this would only make sense if Roger is now some journeyman barely ranked in the top 20.

You can't simultaneously praise Roger had he converted on one of those match points in the Wimbledon final but also shrug your shoulders dismissively about Novak beating him in that match...Roger can't be one point away from winning the biggest tournament of the year and also be too old if he fails to. He clearly was playing well enough to win it. You watch his level, and it was that of a great player. Obviously, not where he was in his prime but then again, what is? So how is Novak beating him not a great victory?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bonaca

Bonaca

Major Winner
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
2,114
Reactions
867
Points
113
I don't get it...if you beat someone ranked number 3 in the world and still competing for major titles...it's supposed to be viewed in a negative light?

You guys really are taking the house money thing to a new extreme. Yeah, I understand why you'd want to praise Roger's victories over these two while diminishing the impact of the times in which they beat him at this point in his career, but this would only make sense if Roger is now some journeyman barely ranked in the top 20.

You can't simultaneously praise Roger had he converted on one of those match points in the Wimbledon final but also shrug your shoulders dismissively about Novak beating him in that match...Roger can't be one point away from winning the biggest tournament of the year and also be too old if he fails to. He clearly was playing well enough to win it. You watch his level, and it was that of a great player. Obviously, not where he was in his prime but then again, what is? So how is Novak beating him not a great victory?
This is exactly what I tried to point out , but couldn’t as nice as you did because my language- skills are limited.:good:
 

Andy22

Major Winner
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
1,975
Reactions
488
Points
83
Location
Australia
Federer fans can cry about age all they want but it took him 8 years in his 30s to win 4 slams, while nadal only 3 years already passed him with 5 grand slam titles.
 

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
22,969
Reactions
3,902
Points
113
Federer fans can cry about age all they want but it took him 8 years in his 30s to win 4 slams, while nadal only 3 years already passed him with 5 grand slam titles.

Nadal has no real competition on clay and the 2 US Opens he won he had the fortune of Federer being injured in 2017 when he would have been the clear favourite if not for injury and Djokovic being injured and missing it completely. Then this year Federer AND Djokovic were both injured again. It's good to look at the overall picture before stupidly bragging, especially when you're bragging on behalf of a third party and not even yourself.
 
Last edited:

Andy22

Major Winner
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
1,975
Reactions
488
Points
83
Location
Australia
Nadal has no real competition on clay and the 2 US Opens he won he had the fortune of Federer being injured in 2017 when he would have been the clear favourite if not for injury and Djokovic being injured and missing it completel. Then this year Federer AND Djokovic were both injured again. It's good to look at the overall picture before stupidly bragging, especially when you're bragging on behalf of a third party and not even yourself.
well yea you can be saitly making excurses but that I said is a fact nadal will always be better in his 30s than old mate, even Djokovic has been better than federer in his 30s 4 grand slam titles at only 32] the last time Federer was on top of tennis as 2009 then nadal got injured even he said himself he had a great chance to end number no.1 that year No real competiton on clay yet thiem just beat both Djokovic Federer lol work on your troll game.
 
Last edited:

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
22,969
Reactions
3,902
Points
113
well yea you can be saitly making excurses but that I said is a fact nadal will always be better in his 30s than old mate, even Djokovic has been better than federer in his 30s 4 grand slam titles at only 32] the last time Federer was on top of tennis as 2009 then nadal got injured even he said himself he had a great chance to end number no.1 that year No real competiton on clay yet thiem just beat both Djokovic Federer lol work on your troll game.

And wtf exactly does Thiem beating a poor version of Djokovic and Federer on clay have to do with Nadal ? Thiem may have beaten Nadal at the best of 3 clay events but he's been poor enough at RG. So, I'll say it again, Nadal has no real competition on clay. That's because he's so good on clay but there are plenty of contenders on grass and hard court. And I don't troll, I post facts.
 

Nadalfan2013

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
2,768
Reactions
1,426
Points
113
And wtf exactly does Thiem beating a poor version of Djokovic and Federer on clay have to do with Nadal ? Thiem may have beaten Nadal at the best of 3 clay events but he's been poor enough at RG. So, I'll say it again, Nadal has no real competition on clay. That's because he's so good on clay but there are plenty of contenders on grass and hard court. And I don't troll, I post facts.

Haha or maybe on hardcourt and grass nobody is stunning enough to dominate like Nadal at RG. There are plenty of contenders on clay it’s just that Nadal plays at a God level there so he shuts them down. Federer and Djokovic are just not as stunning on their favorite surfaces so they lose more. Nadal can beat a wall at RG. :bye:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy22