August said:
Hello all!
I wrote last week week about how commercialism has changed racing in F1. This time I've written about how commercialism has changed the game of tennis.
http://augustonsports.blogspot.fi/2013/08/how-commercialism-is-destroying-sports_12.html
I wanted to post that in my blog, as I has a similar text about F1 last week. But I might post my next tennis text here, on the other hand I may not have too much time for writing in next weeks.
That's a great read, August. To an extent, the game has been neutered. The great rollicking wildness of it has been removed. Players no longer have to re-learn the game for different surfaces: they can play HC tennis across the board, with few adjustments. The commercial factor played a huge part in the 90's, with Pete v Goran in 1994 being held up as the specimen of everything that was now wrong with the game: the players had outgrown the surface and rallies were reduced to miniscule twitches of reflexes and horrendously large serves.
But even still, the victories weren't random, it wasn't as if anyone with a huge serve could win Wimbledon. Class and skill still ruled at the top level, like it does now, but the casual fans who switched on to watch the classiness of Borg and Gerulaitus now had a new breed of sleek sharks in the water who pumped the ball so fast you never got a minute to stick on the kettle. It became ruthless and stripped bare. The essence was exposed, but the build-up was gone. Unfortunately, when they slowed down grass, the essence was removed and now it's all construction and build-up. It's become like 80's and 90's clay: long rallies , and little or no net-play.
So maybe they'll speed it up even a smidgen, because for all its faults with the casual gawker, the connoisseur loved the macho sword-play of S&V tennis, the truncated swings and improvised half-volleys, taken at speed and dispatched with great finesse and accuracy...