the AntiPusher said:Front242 said:10sfan said:I can't believe she did not know. Her team would have told her. My guess is that she chose to gamble, probably deciding to get off it as soon as AO is done and hope to not get caught. She is guilty; what kind of punishment is given remains the question. If the governing body does not apply the one year ban, it is setting a bad precedent.
Setting a one year ban would be bad. It should be 2 years. The drug she was taking for 10 years has a 2 month half life so she must be one hell of an idiot 'cos taking it 2 months prior and still having it in your system when tested is as dense as it gets.
I think it will be one year ban only
ITF said nothing until after Maria announced it. If she had chosen to stay quiet, and maintained having an "injured arm" or something, I very much doubt the WTA or ITF would have said anything, at least until everything had been hashed out (appeal process, backdated TUE possibility, etc).What a shocker! I don't know what surprises me more: that Sharapova took PEDs or that the WTA/ITF did not cover it up. Sharapova is a big name in tennis.
Thanks GSM, I just saw this same statement on ESPN, 2-4 years per her lawyer. That is crucialGameSetAndMath said:As per the Tennis antidoping agency,
1. If someone does this intentionally, the ban is for four years.
2. If the substance is found in the system, but not by intention, then the ban is two years.
3. If 2 above applies and there are mitigating circumstance, then the ban is one year.
So, unless there is a clause that says "If 3 above applies and the player involved is very famous, then the ban is six months", Maria will be out for one year.
See this ESPN clip
Actually, we have no proof that the ITF would have said anything. They have no history of coming forward about bans, or drug test failures with any coherent policy mandate. I have to believe this was Sharapova getting ahead of it. Which was smart. And if nothing else, she's a smart business women. The ITF has never proven itself to be savvy in terms of clarity on doping issues.I hadn't considered your first sentence masterclass but it raises an interesting point.
ITF said nothing until after Maria announced it. If she had chosen to stay quiet, and maintained having an "injured arm" or something, I very much doubt the WTA or ITF would have said anything, at least until everything had been hashed out (appeal process, backdated TUE possibility, etc).
Would they have said something? I'm guessing so... or I don't think Maria would have made the announcement. Maybe they did a deal where they wouldn't say anything until Maria went public.