Mashamasher said:
GameSetAndMath said:
That is a lot of assumptions. May be she thought she would not be chosen for testing at AO.
May be she thought she could get away due to her Diva status. May be she just took a calculated risk and it backfired.
Her lawyer will argue that the high level is consistent with very recent use, she will agree that is so, and that she took it near to the test, she will say she knew she would be tested as she was a Top 10 player, she will say she had no idea it had been banned, she will say she would have stopped taking it before January if she had known it was banned. She must be treated as any other player offering that evidence.
It would unfair for extra suspicion to surround her just because who she is.
What kind of non-sensical argument is this?
Supposing you drive at 90 mph on highway and when stopped if you tell the cop, "look I did not see the sign that says speed limit is 70 and if I had seen it, I would not have driven at 90". Is that a valid excuse. Ignorance of rules is not an excuse to break it. Otherwise, I could even murder you and claim that I did not know that killing is illegal.
Also, she is not being treated with extra suspicion because who she is.
She has admitted to taking it after Jan 1st and so case is closed. The other athletes who got away, got away because they did not admit to taking it after Jan 1st and there is a possibility that they actually stopped it in time and traces of Meldonium appeared in their samples from old usage.