N
NADAL2005RG
Kieran said:What's the time allowance between a first and second serve?
Its optional unless you get a warning. And giving a warning is optional too.
Kieran said:What's the time allowance between a first and second serve?
Denisovich said:Rule 30 "Play shall be continuous from the first service until the match is concluded, in accordance with the following provisions:
(a) If the first service is a fault, the second service must be struck by the Server without delay.
The Receiver must play to the reasonable pace of the Server and must be ready to receive when the Server is ready to serve."
Moxie629 said:So the QFs are set, and so is the YEC. Everyone who plays tomorrow has qualified for the O2.
GameSetAndMath said:What a weird tournament; All the qualifers to WTF are in Quarterfinals.
p.s. Paris is supposed to be a tournament where underdogs have their day.
All seeds made it to QF except for my finalist pick (Tsonga). Even he is
replaced by No. 9 seed in QF.
Denisovich said:GameSetAndMath said:What a weird tournament; All the qualifers to WTF are in Quarterfinals.
p.s. Paris is supposed to be a tournament where underdogs have their day.
All seeds made it to QF except for my finalist pick (Tsonga). Even he is
replaced by No. 9 seed in QF.
Yeah, this is really remarkable. Seems everybody is still hungry. VERY different from last years. Maybe even more invested in this then in the WTF?
I think for everyone there is an explanation.
Nadal: maybe wants to make up for his poor indoor record and is seeking the WTF crown (also Djokovic still marginally on the hunt for no 1)
Djokovic: probably wants to end on a high note after two slam final losses
Federer: wants to make up for a terrible season
Ferrer: defending champion
Wawrinka and Gasquet: wanted to qualify for the WTF, having a great year
Berdych: always does good indoors
DP: on fire at the moment
Broken_Shoelace said:Janowicz is such a gimmicky player. He obviously has a lot of upside and should learn how to construct points better/improve shot selection as he matures, but for now, there's a lot wrong with how he goes about his "gameplan."
Yes, crushing the ball, returning aggressively and mixing things up with drop shots are good tactics against Nadal, but Jerzy needs to realize he's not playing a juniors player or on the challengers circuit. These players will adapt if you abuse something long enough. Once Nadal started anticipating the drop shots and reading his serve better, Janowicz looked a bit out of ideas for a period of 4-5 games (end of the first set till midway through the second). He actually looked surprised when some serves came back and was not ready to play the next ball. To his credit, he settled down towards the end of the match, played his game, and did better, but that was after he had gotten broken so it was too little too late. The first set was a serve fest, so there's not much there.
He also has some mobility problems, which is expected. Every time Nadal went behind him with his cross court forehand, Janowicz netted the ball, even when he wasn't necessarily stretched out. That bailed Rafa out on many occasions, especially given that he wasn't hitting his inside out forehand well, and it's a shot that looks pedestrian indoors, usually.
Front242 said:JJ reminds me a bit of Djokovic and Gulbis with the ill timed overuse of the dropshot. It worked wonders here last year but people know his game now and expect it and the element of surprise is gone. Especially when he does it around 4-5 times in a single game! Nuts. I always wish he'd use the body serve more. Been saying it for ages. He did the same against Murray at Wimbledon. Played 1 great set and then got totally predictable on serve and Murray was reading it like a book. When your biggest weapon is neutralized you're toast.
Denisovich said:Broken_Shoelace said:Janowicz is such a gimmicky player. He obviously has a lot of upside and should learn how to construct points better/improve shot selection as he matures, but for now, there's a lot wrong with how he goes about his "gameplan."
Yes, crushing the ball, returning aggressively and mixing things up with drop shots are good tactics against Nadal, but Jerzy needs to realize he's not playing a juniors player or on the challengers circuit. These players will adapt if you abuse something long enough. Once Nadal started anticipating the drop shots and reading his serve better, Janowicz looked a bit out of ideas for a period of 4-5 games (end of the first set till midway through the second). He actually looked surprised when some serves came back and was not ready to play the next ball. To his credit, he settled down towards the end of the match, played his game, and did better, but that was after he had gotten broken so it was too little too late. The first set was a serve fest, so there's not much there.
He also has some mobility problems, which is expected. Every time Nadal went behind him with his cross court forehand, Janowicz netted the ball, even when he wasn't necessarily stretched out. That bailed Rafa out on many occasions, especially given that he wasn't hitting his inside out forehand well, and it's a shot that looks pedestrian indoors, usually.
Thanks for that breakdown. I only saw the last part of the match but that inside out forehand looked pretty good in the last games when he was running around his backhand.