Kyrgios's problem: skill, not on-court attitude

[Nadalfan2013]

I'm sure it has nothing to do with him owning your boy's soul for most of the past 8+ years.

9-6 in slams vs Djoko. 10-4 in slams vs Fed.

My post has everything to do with his disgusting temper.

 

[Front242]

9-6 in slams vs Djoko. 10-4 in slams vs Fed.

My post has everything to do with his disgusting temper.

Actually your post was completely fucking retarded 'cos you posted a clip of him against Carreno Busta claiming Djokovic is disgusting when he loses. Well, guess what, genius. He won the match and has never lost to him ever.

http://www.stevegtennis.com/head-to-head/men/Pablo_Carreno_Busta/Novak_Djokovic/

 

[Nadalfan2013]

Actually your post was completely fucking retarded 'cos you posted a clip of him against Carreno Busta claiming Djokovic is disgusting when he loses. Well, guess what, genius. He won the match and has never lost to him ever.

http://www.stevegtennis.com/head-to-head/men/Pablo_Carreno_Busta/Novak_Djokovic/

I never said he lost “”the match”, It could have been loses a point or a game, just when things are not going his way.

 

[Front242]

I never said he lost “”the match”, It could have been loses a point or a game, just when things are not going his way.

Don't try and weasel your way out of it. Here's what you typed before you edit it and the link to your post is below.

"If I was that ball kid I would have walked to the umpire and asked to leave the court because I deserve to be treated like a human being. I dislike Djokovic so much. He's all smiles when he wins but when he loses he is disgusting."

It's obvious you meant when he's loses matches but he won that match and for the record, Djokovic is very respectful at the net to all opponents even when he loses, so basically your post is 100% untrue and pointless horseshit just trying to wind people up 'cos you hate Djokovic.

https://www.tennisfrontier.com/tenn...not-on-court-attitude.6558/page-2#post-396475

 

[Nadalfan2013]

Look it’s not a secret that Djokovic is by far the least popular out of the big three, sometimes even begging for the crowd to like him. Well he should look at his own attitude when things are not going his way, he’s just not very likeable.

 

[Nadalfan2013]

Don't try and weasel your way out of it. Here's what you typed before you edit it and the link to your post is below.

"If I was that ball kid I would have walked to the umpire and asked to leave the court because I deserve to be treated like a human being. I dislike Djokovic so much. He's all smiles when he wins but when he loses he is disgusting."

It's obvious you meant when he's loses matches but he won that match.

https://www.tennisfrontier.com/tenn...not-on-court-attitude.6558/page-2#post-396475

Exactly sometimes I’ve seen him losing a match and being all angry and violent and then he eventually turns it around and wins it and he’s all happy and cute. Open your eyes.

 

[Front242]

Exactly sometimes I’ve seen him losing a match and being all angry and violent and then he eventually turns it around and wins it and he’s all happy and cute. Open your eyes.

My eyes are wide open. Nadal shouts puta when losing too and Federer curses at times too. Stop being even more of an idiot than usual.

 

[Moxie]

Wtf is this? Slag all players not named Nadal week? First you're calling Kyrgios disgusting and now Djokovic. Nadal shouts "puta" a lot and you obviously missed the day he shouted banana like an ignorant prick to a ball kid. None of them are perfect. Federer used to break racquets a lot in his earlier years on tour. So basically none of them are saints or role models. Now grow up.

I'm sorry, but you are basically the only one defending Kyrios's most recent behavior. You have a completely biased take on Rafa's on-court behavior, saying that his MTO's are "fake" (even though he's the most often injured of the big 3, with chronic knee issues,) that the tics and slowness/lateness he's had his whole career are aimed at the other player, not at his own concentration; and then you say that his behavior is deliberate, while excusing Nick's as the misbehavior of an emotional player, full stop. How do you know that one is aimed at the other player, and the other is not? In any case, as @brokenshoelace rightly says, Nick's antics are incredibly disruptive to the other player, on many more occasions, and much more egregious ways. For you to decide the motivations behind and assign blame accordingly is your reading in what you want. As to your excusing Nick, let me point out that you said above that he hasn't hurt anyone YET. That's a strong endorsement of his behavior, eh?

Small linguistic note: Nadal is not saying "puta." He wouldn't. He's surely saying "hijo de puta," which means "son of a bitch," basically. Sure, he could be talking about his opponent, but he uses it as an under-breath exclamation, which, in Spanish is commonly a inwardly directed. Effectively the equivalent of "goddammit." In Spain, it's not really considered a strong oath when used in this way. Obviously, Murray notoriously dropped the F-bombs a lot, which is pretty strong. We are told that Novak swears in Serbian, but most people don't care about that. Roger is known to use foul language including in English. In any case, tennis players, like the rest of us, tend to swear under their breaths when they fuck up. This is not nearly the same as calling an umpire a "fucking tool" and spitting at him. So just curious about your standards of misbehavior.

 

[Front242]

Right, we get it. Just like Nadalfan2013 , you also think Nadal is a saint. Back to your care bears and happy world the 2 of you 'cos I'm frankly bored to death of it. Nadal doesn't swear, he just leaves the court before his opponent serves for the match or decides to take off his bandages and shoes. So 1 curses more than the other but the guy who curses is way more sporting than the cheating c**t. I censored that 'cos Nadal fans hate cursing and Nadal himself doesn't curse as much as bad, bad, Federer and Djokovic. He just cheats.

 

[backhandslapper]

I think a lot of people here need to Google gamesmanship. Kyrgios is not deliberately arguing with the umpire to distract and beat his opponent. Nadal IS stalling to piss his opponents off, he IS using fake MTOs to piss off his opponents and get back on level terms when losing, he DID leave the court deliberately to take a shit/piss whatever before his opponent served for the match at Indian Wells against Federer and, finally, he knew exactly what he was doing messing with his bandages before Federer served for their Wimbledon semi this year. Sure, they only started bugging him right then. As if. Nadal fans. Christ.

One is a born cheat and the other is just tempermental although I'd argue it's warranted when umpires do a shit job of not enforcing the rules and allowing players to slow play to a crawl. Everyone knows how fast Kyrgios plays and that gobshite Fergus Murphy gave him a time violation a few days ago. Seriously, a time violation for one of the fastest players on tour?! Wtf is that? That was what set him off when he said how the hell does he not penalize Nadal. 99% of the umpires are gutless cowards and should be fired and new ones with balls should be hired.

Was Kyrgios conduct poor? Absolutely 100% Shouldn't have spit and cursed as much but the bottom line is, he was right on principle. Rules are not being enforced properly.

I think you need to google logical fallacies.

Reasoning with 'everyone knows' equals to mass appeal.

The bottom line is, since you know fuck all about true reasons and motivations behind Kyrgios' nonsense justice warrior act while being sooo apologetic underlines that nature wasted a skull on you, as it -- obviously -- wraps nothing.

Kyrgios does not need a time violation or a warning to snap. What he needs is playing poorly or feeling off. Then he will snap and complain about anything and everything. It's definitely his way to 'control the pace and momentum' of the match. He is no victim of his temperament. He deliberately puts pressure on umpires by bitching and provoking them. He's responsible for his behavior. And if he wants to criticize the others, he'd better start with himself. So far, I have only seen idiotic fed-fans-ever-since-2012 take him seriously. They love him with a passion only the Stockholm syndrome can provide (because he is yet to lock the horns with your sacred cow).

 

[brokenshoelace]

I think a lot of people here need to Google gamesmanship. Kyrgios is not deliberately arguing with the umpire to distract and beat his opponent. Nadal IS stalling to piss his opponents off, he IS using fake MTOs to piss off his opponents and get back on level terms when losing, he DID leave the court deliberately to take a shit/piss whatever before his opponent served for the match at Indian Wells against Federer and, finally, he knew exactly what he was doing messing with his bandages before Federer served for their Wimbledon semi this year. Sure, they only started bugging him right then. As if. Nadal fans. Christ.

One is a born cheat and the other is just tempermental although I'd argue it's warranted when umpires do a shit job of not enforcing the rules and allowing players to slow play to a crawl. Everyone knows how fast Kyrgios plays and that gobshite Fergus Murphy gave him a time violation a few days ago. Seriously, a time violation for one of the fastest players on tour?! Wtf is that? That was what set him off when he said how the hell does he not penalize Nadal. 99% of the umpires are gutless cowards and should be fired and new ones with balls should be hired.

Was Kyrgios conduct poor? Absolutely 100% Shouldn't have spit and cursed as much but the bottom line is, he was right on principle. Rules are not being enforced properly.

This is some presumptuous arbitrary bullshit. Honestly your posts have been pure shit lately. Step your game up.

 

[brokenshoelace]

I think you need to google logical fallacies.

Reasoning with 'everyone knows' equals to mass appeal.

The bottom line is, since you know fuck all about true reasons and motivations behind Kyrgios' nonsense justice warrior act while being sooo apologetic underlines that nature wasted a skull on you, as it -- obviously -- wraps nothing.

Kyrgios does not need a time violation or a warning to snap. What he needs is playing poorly or feeling off. Then he will snap and complain about anything and everything. It's definitely his way to 'control the pace and momentum' of the match. He is no victim of his temperament. He deliberately puts pressure on umpires by bitching and provoking them. He's responsible for his behavior. And if he wants to criticize the others, he'd better start with himself. So far, I have only seen idiotic fed-fans-ever-since-2012 take him seriously. They love him with a passion only the Stockholm syndrome can provide (because he is yet to lock the horns with your sacred cow).

EXACTLY. Jesus Christ.

 

[Front242]

This is some presumptuous arbitrary bullshit. Honestly your posts have been pure shit lately. Step your game up.

The truth hurts. People post facts about Nadal and apparently it makes it a shit post. Easiest way to reply I guess. Good to know.

 

[Ricardo]

I think you need to google logical fallacies.

Reasoning with 'everyone knows' equals to mass appeal.

The bottom line is, since you know fuck all about true reasons and motivations behind Kyrgios' nonsense justice warrior act while being sooo apologetic underlines that nature wasted a skull on you, as it -- obviously -- wraps nothing.

Kyrgios does not need a time violation or a warning to snap. What he needs is playing poorly or feeling off. Then he will snap and complain about anything and everything. It's definitely his way to 'control the pace and momentum' of the match. He is no victim of his temperament. He deliberately puts pressure on umpires by bitching and provoking them. He's responsible for his behavior. And if he wants to criticize the others, he'd better start with himself. So far, I have only seen idiotic fed-fans-ever-since-2012 take him seriously. They love him with a passion only the Stockholm syndrome can provide (because he is yet to lock the horns with your sacred cow).

so he snaps with the full intention to distract his opponent? bullshit, you, Moxie and bs are just full of shit, probably never good enough to play competition at any decent level in your pathetic lives. You don't throw off Federer, Novak or Nadal no matter what antics you bring, you think they are idiotic couch rubbish like you lot who would fall for that? In fact most of his wins against the big 3 he didn't even throw tantrums, tantrum or not had nothing to do with how he ended up winning.

Funny thing on this forum is, couch potatoes come up with conspiracy theory with absolute no evidence or even common sense, with no real life experience on court they think they know better than experts, and think of things even the pros are unaware of, and they pat themselves on the back for being so 'intelligent'...…..oh the fuckn dumb ass potatoes.

 

[brokenshoelace]

The truth hurts. People post facts about Nadal and apparently it makes it a shit post. Easiest way to reply I guess. Good to know.

No no no, don't respond with a bunch of "the truth hurts" bullshit when your post fell apart under the merest hint of examination. See backhandslapper's response, which you've very conveniently ignored.

 

[Ricardo]

EXACTLY. Jesus Christ.

Christ you should be too embarrassed to post your nonsense, just stay on the couch and stay put. Real tennis talk is beyond you, you want to make up bs you know where to go. Anyway, where did Becker say that literally everyone did the coaching shit like you CLAIMED?

 

[backhandslapper]

so he snaps with the full intention to distract his opponent? bullshit, you, Moxie and bs are just full of shit, probably never good enough to play competition at any decent level in your pathetic lives. You don't throw off Federer, Novak or Nadal no matter what antics you bring, you think they are idiotic couch rubbish like you lot who would fall for that? In fact most of his wins against the big 3 he didn't even throw tantrums, tantrum or not had nothing to do with how he ended up winning.

Funny thing on this forum is, couch potatoes come up with conspiracy theory with absolute no evidence or even common sense, with no real life experience on court they think they know better than experts, and think of things even the pros are unaware of, and they pat themselves on the back for being so 'intelligent'...…..oh the fuckn dumb ass potatoes.

He didn't even throw tantrums because he was good to win. Thank you for volunteering to underscore our point. Now, what was your level, honey?

 

[Front242]

No no no, don't respond with a bunch of "the truth hurts" bullshit when your post fell apart under the merest hint of examination. See backhandslapper's response, which you've very conveniently ignored.

I haven't conveniently ignored it. There seems to some dumb consensus around here (mostly by Nadal fans it has to be said) that by not replying someone has ignored it. Fact: people work, people have busy schedules, people go to the gym after work. I tick all 3 there. I might have time to reply to shorter posts but not everything and I may still reply later. It seems around here if you don't reply immediately it's apparently been ignored.

The one thing I'll say in reply to his dumb fucking post is the part about nature apparently wasting a skull on me. The guy has 8 fucking likes (not that anyone really gives a shit about likes but it shows not many people like his posts which in itself says a lot actually) and if I could I either use my nature wasted skull to headbutt him or just sling it in his general direction I gladly would find the time to at least do that right now.

Edit, he now has a whopping 10 likes. Whoopy fucking do lol.

 

[backhandslapper]

and if I could I either use my nature wasted skull to headbutt him or just sling it in his general direction I gladly would find the time to at least do that right now.

Unfortunately, you can't use your skull to do anything at all, helpless mk warrior. Thus it's completely wasted on you.

So will be the information that a majority of my 'posts' is from the chat I come on every GS final. That's pretty much my posting history on here. I seldom ever post directly on the boards. Which makes it even worse for you, dunce. If out of the ten whole likes I've received, a good fifth or so comes with the post dedicated to exposing your stupidity, does it say more about me -- or how people perceive you?

EDIT: I did a quick count. I have about 30 regular posts on the entire board. Another bitter pill for ya, dunce.

 

[Front242]

Unfortunately, you can't use your skull to do anything at all, helpless mk warrior. Thus it's completely wasted on you.

So will be the information that a majority of my 'posts' is from the chat I come on every GS final. That's pretty much my posting history on here. I seldom ever post directly on the boards. Which makes it even worse for you, dunce. If out of the ten whole likes I've received, a good fifth or so comes with the post dedicated to exposing your stupidity, does it say more about me -- or how people perceive you?

Nice try, numbnuts. You just post stupid Federer hate in most of your posts. You haven't exposed a whole fucking lot here except your 10 lowly likes. Check the number of mine compared to yours. That, to a sane person, would indicate they see more sense in mine than yours. Duh.