brokenshoelace
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reactions
- 1,335
- Points
- 113
Riotbeard said:Broken_Shoelace said:federberg said:http://www.tennisworldusa.org/sergiy-stakhovsky-whenever-roger-federer-loses-all-say-that-he-is-finished-but-when-rafael-nadal-lost-articolo23922.html?
He sort of has a point out there in the public. But judging by some comments on here, maybe not!
Actually I don't understand his point. If people react differently it's because these are two different situations. People are more prepared to say Roger is done because he's much older and has been losing more and more frequently for years (not a couple of matches as Stakhovsky claims). With Rafa he was the king of clay as recently as last year and until he loses at RG again, people are hesitant, and rightly so. Anyway, I don't understand what he's trying to say. Are people harsh on Roger or does he think Nadal is done?
Regardless, we can at least all agree that Nadal has declined, so that's a start.
Rafa won RG last year, but he was hardly the king of clay compared to the rest of his career. He has not been the same player for a year and a half, and people do still talk like he is about to turn a corner. Maybe he is, but I get the point. People have been talking about Fed retiring since at least 2011...
That's kind the point though. If people are optimistic about Nadal now as Stakhovsky claims (even though I don't see the optimism, but whatever) it's because they panicked last year when Nadal went through something similar, and in the end, at the FO, he proved he was still the king of clay.
And i don't know who really thinks Nadal will turn a corner. He's not getting any younger or faster. He won't be playing this bad forever though.