- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,867
- Reactions
- 15,041
- Points
- 113
This is sensible. I think there was a lot of Murray-hating in that mix, but he has had shingles. Still, watching last night's match or the loss to M. Zverev made stylistic match-up sense. Also, for the reasons we all know, Murray is not an imposing or convincing #1, so he doesn't get the locker room cred that Roger, Rafa and Novak have enjoyed. He got there finally, and deserved it, but no one is so completely intimidated that they think they can't beat him.Perhaps we are not accustomed to what occurred more often at the top of the men's game in the nineties and early 2000s? Jim courier, Andre Agassi, Pete Sampras (not as often mind you), Carlos Moya and Marcelo rios would get upset at events FAR more often than Federer, Novak or Rafa in their primes. Roger and Novak, in particular, dominated for longer and more completely than anybody since McEnroe in 1984 or Borg in 1979-1980. Maybe we are on the road of less dominance by one or even two players?