Front242
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 22,986
- Reactions
- 3,919
- Points
- 113
Kieran said:El Dude said:Kieran said:It's only "match up" if match up includes a helluva lot more than mere technical difficulties. The H2H portrays as much as any stat can, including slam numbers and so forth. They all require context and analysis. Close analysis of Fedal makes us Rafa fans feel very confident. Smug, even...
Confident about what? That Rafa has a significant matchup edge over Roger? No one would disagree with that; but again, it is a rock-paper-scissors thing. Or are you confident that Rafa was a better player than Roger? You'll find a lot of folks that dispute that. It does seem that you "smug Rafa fans" like to conflate the two, which of course is ridiculous (otherwise Davydenko is better than Rafa, or Dustin Brown!).
And what does "close analysis" mean to you? Seeing what you want to see? But I'm still waiting for your close analysis that goes beyond the usual pissing contest stuff...
All statistics only tell part the tale, brother, and since I previously accused you of only seeing what you want to see in your analysis, I can only say touché to your choice of words. Rafa a better player than Roger? On the big stage, and in matches between them, I'd certainly say so...
But as you say, it's an old pissing contest. Myself and fiero have just been reminiscing on an even older one: Borg and Mac. You have the lefty in your avatar: his match with Borg in 1980, and Rafas with Novak in 2012, are the only two really alt-history temptations I ever indulge in regularly. In my dreams... :cover
That explains why nobodies take him to 5 sets often and his matches are twice as long a lot of the time than Roger's. Better think that over methinks.