You cite Is data as the poster boy confirming these vaccines be "crap". To let me better understand your opinion, can you explain better what and why is "crap"? Are you talking about all types of vaccines in general (not only Covid-19) or just mNRA vaccines like Pfizer which is the primary vaccines in Is?
Yep, I share your reservations re those vaccines. I remember few months Pizer (mNRA in general) was praised as revolutionary technology much more effective in teaching the immune response, compared with traditional vaccines such as AZ. Today, I hear studies that Pfizer's effectiveness wanes faster than AZs to the point that AZ is more effective long term >6 mo. So experts and clinicians no doubt will change their opinions as the result. We don't have enough data yet to know what is definitely good and what is bad strategy in this fight with Covid-19. But the approved vaccines are the best strategy we have ATM, with proven statistics of hospitalization reduction in my country in particular, so we have to stick to it.
People are releasing stuff on obscure podcasts and sites because the media are censoring the living shit out of anyone who goes against the narrative. I'm sorry but if people haven't copped this by now, there's just no hope for them. You can slate the obscure podcasts as much as you like, the fact remains, the stats are WAY, WAY WORSE this time this year with covid vaccines than they were last year and the current dominant Delta strain is only more transmissible but way less deadly so why then are more people dying?! I think you and most of the world hiding under a huge rock need to open your eyes and see the truth. Of course scientists can be wrong but, again, going back to the stats, they are absolute crap now compared to last year before the so called vaccines appeared. People in Israel have had 3 shots of this crap within less than a year and their bs "green pass" is valid for only 6 months meaning a 4th shot will be due then or going back to being a 2nd class citizen which means 2 shots per year of an experimental drug with no long term studies done. That's why immune systems are being destroyed and why cases, hospitalizations and deaths are increasing. And finally, no, I've nothing against proper vaccines with years and years of proper peer reviews and studies, but that's the polar opposite of a global scaremongering, money based jab the planet agenda for a virus with a 99.97% survival rate that many will not only never even get but that they will be just fine after catching it even with no vaccines. You know why they don't push natural immunity? Because it makes no one any money! Vaccines that fuck all people need, however, make the rich even richer. This is all about money, power, deceit and corruption.You cite Is data as the poster boy confirming these vaccines be "crap". To let me better understand your opinion, can you explain better what and why is "crap"? Are you talking about all types of vaccines in general (not only Covid-19) or just mNRA vaccines like Pfizer which is the primary vaccines in Is?
OK, there is one expert you quote who tries to undermine the efficacy of Pfizer by pointing out the phenomenon of ADE. But then, why is this expect undermining the very thing he invented and should be proud of, and why is he doing it on an obscure, right-wing podcast rather than in peer-reviewed literature? If I was in his shoes, having an expert understanding of the things, I would be going for peer-reviewed publication of my opinion. If he doesn't do then, I conclude because he cannot get one. Searching reasonably looking literature on the subject, like this one:
I can find that ADE happened "on few occasions" in dengue fever. But that was in the past. Today, and I quote:Vaccine Safety: Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Vaccines
Immune responses to pathogens involve many cells and proteins of the immune system. Early during an infection, these responses are non-specific, meaning that although they are directed at the pathogen, they are not specific to it. This is called innate immunity.www.chop.edu
"Today’s routinely recommended vaccines do not cause ADE. If they did, like those described above, they would be removed from use. Phase III clinical trials are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects before a vaccine is approved for use."
As everywhere, even in science, you can find a scientist who may be wrong. Even climate scientists can be wrong... And I can find many examples, most (if not all of them) linked to right-wing think tanks. To judge what is right or wrong, you have to look at the broad evidence, not just a 1 obscure interview in the dark corner of blogosphere such as your right wing podcast.
Sure.Barron sorry for the late delay..the Covid 19 virus is a "Alien" virus meaning it is looking for a host body to take over. Yes, the vaccine vaccination shot is going to do wonders as for as helping a normal body to build antibodies defenses but it's not a 100 percent antidote. Over the past three months there have been several mutations of the COVID 19 virus especially the Delta variant. A booster shot would help a body that has already built some antibodies defenses with an additional enzymes to reinforce the antibodies against the numerous new stains of the virus..I'm no medical professional but this should be the rational why a booster is a wise decision. I hope that answers your questions.
Again, if anyone on this Earth deserves the right to rely on their beliefs their immune system is sufficient to reside without the assistance of a VACCINE during the worst pandemic of generations it should be Front.
Again..if anyone believes they can defeat this virus butt naked and with their vitamins only it's Front.
Again, Front doesn't a vaccine vaccination shot, he believes that he can handle whatever coming.
The vaccine vaccination shot is supposed to lessen the odds that the Covid 19 virus will completely destroy the host body immune system.No it's not a 100 percent antidote..no one NEVER said it was supposed to be. That's is where all the confusion is.
You're making up the numbers. Yours "99.97% survival rate" is absolute hand-waving, alternative reality rubbish. The latest stats:
www.worldometers.info
www.cdc.gov
Yep, great vaccines. Without them, it would have been more deaths. As for the large number of "145,099 new cases in the US and 1738 deaths reported today" (out of 330mln population), we need to know the breakdown how many of them have been vaccinated and the percentage of vaccinated population (both single & double) to judge the efficacy of the vaccine. I suspect most of sick and especially dead ones, have not been vaccinated: I've heard there are plenty of anti-vaxxers in US and the virus is taking stronghold mainly in those anti-vax states.
Well I've been just fine since the start of this scamdemic so far and don't see that changing.
Wrong. That's what the corrupt media are telling you. We can all see plain as day that the countries with the highest levels of vaccination also have the largest numbers of cases, hospitalizations and deaths, far surpassing this time last year with no vaccines. These are the final stats from September 9th in the US which clearly shows how amazing these vaccines are.
You keep choosing to believe that and that's entirely your choice. Here are yesterday's final stats for the US and these stats are a disaster compared to when there were no vaccines this time last year.
Just my opinion. Front you keep coming with your conspiracy theories and unproven medical data yet you want to not be ostracized because you are an devout antiVazza . What's your end game? Do you want others to join you in your crusade to prove that you are the superior human specimen or do you want more people to defy the science as you have chosen to?
I'm not anti vaccine at all, I'm anti rushed covid vaccines (and made that quite clear before in this thread) and the whole bs agenda to vaccinate the whole planet for some virus that's far from deadly to most people. All the people with no vaccines who are alive and well are defying the science just fine and will continue to do so.
