Fine. Then my only point to you, as it ever was: hold the same standards for both. And apparently you might, if you read your own posts: (quoted from your above): "EVERY athlete has an incentive to cheat." While you said earlier: "Also, if he decided to just dope this year when he's already considered to be the GOAT by most people that'd be pretty stupid." Well, then, however stupid you might say it is, Roger had an incentive to cheat, if he wanted more Major titles. As I've said before, I'm not claiming he did, but just consider how hypocritical it sounds, from the outside. You're going with your intuition on both of them, and your intuition is clouded by bias.
As to Rafa, you petulantly keep ignoring the more steady trajectory that his career was on, even though others besides me have tried to explain it to you. Without an injury in 2004, he would likely have made a steadier rise in the rankings. But he was long-poised to be exactly that clay player to come to full-flower in 2005. It is a feature of your fan-blindedness that you believe fully that Roger is so talented that he dominated tennis for so long on his beautiful game, but that it can't be true that another super-talented player couldn't have come up at the shortly behind. That a "Roger Federer" is simply a gift from the gods, and that a "Rafael Nadal" must somehow be manufactured by PEDs. Regardless of our being on opposite sides of the fan-chasm, you have to admit that that's not an even-handed notion. What both have accomplished is down to, more than anything else, extraordinary amounts of talent, dedication to the sport, natural ability and will to achieve. In the skills and IQ specific to tennis, I don't think that PEDs are enough to make up the difference at the very top. For that reason, I'm not interested in your comparisons to ball-bashers in baseball, or the guy who can cheat via mere endurance in the Tour de France.