Lol! A try? I'm not trying anything. The whole debate is silly. I'm only going on with this because it's the only resource you have. Let's look at some rather obvious facts. Federer has 4 slams more than Rafa right? But Rafa leads the H2H. But Rafa has 4 slams more than Novak. And Novak leads the H2H. Now using your argument, by the transitive property, Novak
has to be relevant. Yet I for one have always maintained that Rafa is still ahead of Djokovic
By your very own arguments you make Novak relevant. But I'm not even arguing that point. I'm just telling you what I think people will focus on when this era is past. They'll talk about the trio when describing the era. They'll talk about Roger's slam record when looking at history.
Of course there'll be people like you, saying.. "don't forget Rafa" but those sounds will be dismissed as people just look at the data on their screens...