GameSetAndMath
The GOAT
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 21,141
- Reactions
- 3,398
- Points
- 113
I get you. We all make those grammatical errors because often we have to write quick responses. As to the eventual 3rd set, I think it could have gone either way. While Zverev was playing better than Roger, the momentum could have shifted. The match was still close remember.I didn't say he would have, I said that Roger would still have had to have won the 3rd set. But I will say, based on the way they were playing, now that you ask, I do think Zverev would have won it. Look at @mrzz's posts, and he's a Roger fan. Roger was low on the winners count. Zverev was serving hard and well, and he was committing to some net play. Roger was making poor choices as to when to come in, and getting passed. Do YOU think Roger would have won a 3rd? (EDIT: actually, I made a grammatical error, which I fixed. I didn't mean to give the impression that I thought Zverev would have won, only that Federer still had a set to go. I can see why you might have thought I was insisting for Sasha.)
Thanks. And I get that you would have liked Roger to have had the option to win, with a decider, and the crowd behind him. Sure, he could have. I have a problem, (and it's not with you,) though, about people hanging onto a pivotal point. I think it is extremely rare, to the point of perhaps non-existent, that one point swings a whole match. There are controversial points that we debate (sometimes endlessly,) but the tennis structure allows for resetting. Or also, it can be argued: if you didn't play better before getting to the controversial one, you also have no complaint. I agree that that point swung the momentum in the TB, but no one can swear that Roger would have otherwise won it.I get you. We all make those grammatical errors because often we have to write quick responses. As to the eventual 3rd set, I think it could have gone either way. While Zverev was playing better than Roger, the momentum could have shifted. The match was still close remember.
I think that point could have swung the tiebreak. A tiebreak moves so quickly that you lose a set before you know it.Thanks. And I get that you would have liked Roger to have had the option to win, with a decider, and the crowd behind him. Sure, he could have. I have a problem, (and it's not with you,) though, about people hanging onto a pivotal point. I think it is extremely rare, to the point of perhaps non-existent, that one point swings a whole match. There are controversial points that we debate (sometimes endlessly,) but the tennis structure allows for resetting. Or also, it can be argued: if you didn't play better before getting to the controversial one, you also have no complaint. I agree that that point swung the momentum in the TB, but no one can swear that Roger would have otherwise won it.
I totally get that. But, as I said, there would then have been an entire other set to play, and Roger wasn't looking either the better player, or the fresher.I think that point could have swung the tiebreak. A tiebreak moves so quickly that you lose a set before you know it.
Lendl has done very little coaching and seems to have chosen his players carefully. It's not even arguable that he knows more about tennis, and what he wants to do, than you do. He pushed Murray over the hump. Good chance he'll help Sasha get there, too.Too bad Lendl wastes his coaching talent on unlikeable players like Mugray and Mugrev. No Ivan, we don't need these players to mature, we want them out.
Oh, jeepers. You know, sometimes I think some of you guys don't like him just because he's a dish. He's got a great game and it's improving. I don't see that he's so unlikeable on court. For heaven's sake, don't make it a nationality thing. And for the record, Becker was a MESS...a brat, a drunk and a womanizer. Be careful who you hold up, like Nalbandian in your previous.
Hopefully there is a joke in there, somewhere.That attempted on-court sexual-assault on him was fun to watch.
Too bad Lendl wastes his coaching talent on unlikeable players like Mugray and Mugrev. No Ivan, we don't need these players to mature, we want them out.
I wouldn't use Nalbandian as your example of sportsmanship. Don't forget he was the guy who was defaulted out of Queens Club in a final for harming a lines person. The other thing is, since Zverev saw it, it distracted him. Anyway, the rules are clear. It's not "gamesmanship" (as Fiero said) to ask that the rules be enforced. Anyway, even if Fed had won that TB, he'd still have had to win the 3rd set.
Can some Germans in this forum please tell us why bratrev is so unlike a german? Why isn't he classy like the other germans like Haas? Or even humble like Kohli? Or charming like that scandalous Boris Becker.? Atleast Boris had charisma even though he would be high as kite most of the time.
Zverev is like that kid who got beat up in school, no girl liked him. I bet even smoking a joint won't help this poor kid. What do we do with him?
Hopefully there is a joke in there, somewhere.
OK, now I vaguely remember seeing some girl hugging him. I didn't get the reference. Anyway, I think he has a dog.Oh lighten up. It was hilarious, that girl who seemed to be pretty hot wanted to get a little closer. I was surprised by Zverev's reaction! Is he dating anyone?
Certainly it was unfortunate, but it was born of a display of temper on court, and that's not, in fact the only incident of it from him. He paid out pretty big fines for unsportsmanlike behavior earlier that year in AO, too. Look, I like Nalbandian, I was just saying that monfed could have used a better example for his point. You do amuse me, though. You're very forgiving of players that you like. Let's face it, however unintended, that lines person was rather badly hurt. It's on the far end of poor behavior, for consequence. Whereas, with players you don't like, your hair goes on fire every time they go to the bathroom or argue with an ump. But then you've shown before that you can embrace a double-standard.That incident with Nalbandian was just totally unfortunate. He never intentionally kicked the linesperson and was just annoyed with his erratic play and kicked the stand. He was otherwise a pretty well behaved guy and it's a shame his career gets remembered a lot for just this. He possessed hands down one of the most versatile and incredible backhands of all time and that's what he should be remembered for.
OK, now I vaguely remember seeing some girl hugging him. I didn't get the reference. Anyway, I think he has a dog.
Well there's no such thing as a female sexually assaulting a male. Back in the days I had a life I wouldn't mind the occasional "assault" from a random girl at the bars/clubs. That's why I wonder if Zverev is seeing anyone or maybe plays for the other side.
Can some Germans in this forum please tell us why bratrev is so unlike a german? Why isn't he classy like the other germans like Haas? Or even humble like Kohli? Or charming like that scandalous Boris Becker.? Atleast Boris had charisma even though he would be high as kite most of the time.
Zverev is like that kid who got beat up in school, no girl liked him. I bet even smoking a joint won't help this poor kid. What do we do with him?
Well there's no such thing as a female sexually assaulting a male. Back in the days I had a life I wouldn't mind the occasional "assault" from a random girl at the bars/clubs. That's why I wonder if Zverev is seeing anyone or maybe plays for the other side.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATP World Tour Finals 2017, London, UK | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 691 | ||
Barclays ATP World Tour Finals 2016 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 338 | ||
ATP World Tour Finals | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 281 | ||
Run up to ATP World Tour Finals | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 13 | ||
The Job Of An ATP World Tour Umpire and who's your favourite? | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 6 |