Moxie
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,606
- Reactions
- 14,767
- Points
- 113
You haven't been on the forums enough if you haven't noticed that Andy is still playing, because Fiero complains about it, endlessly.Anyone know why Andy Murray is still playing? Is it for love of the game, money, or because he thinks that, somehow, he'll pull out a final, magical big title or even Slam? To be honest, I keep forgetting that he's still playing, yet he actually played in 16 tournaments this year so far.
A crazy stat: He hasn't won a title since 2019 (an ATP 250) and before that in 2017 (an ATP 500). Since his last title, he's played in 34 tournaments with no titles...34!
I'm reminded of latter-day Lleyton Hewitt or Mats Wilander. Hewitt's last big title was in 2003, but he remained a top 10 player for a few more years, slipping out of the top 10 for good in 2006. But he kept plugging along, ranking in the top 20 as late as 2010, and then winning two improbably titles in 2014. But from 2005 to 2016, he won only 7 titles, one 500 and six 250s, among a total of 150 tournaments played. Gotta respect his tenacity, I guess.
Wilander, of course, had that great 1988 season in which he won 3 Slams and finished #1, and then never won even another Masters. He finished 1989 at #12, and then never ranked within the year-end top 40 again, despite playing until 1996.
Just wondering why Andy is following in the Wilander-Hewitt path. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Not to put the dagger in, but Roger hadn't won a title since 2019, either. It has been tough for Andy since his ranking went to basically zero. He's had some really bad draws. But your bigger question is: why is he still playing?
Who can know? One answer is that Kim has thrown him out of the house, because 4 kids is enough, for right now.
On a more serious note, likely answer is love of competition. You mention Hewitt's late victories, but you glide past that 2 were finals at Halle over Federer in 2010, and in Brisbane over him in 2014. Those must have been sweet.
Also, why does it have to be a Hewitt-Wilander path? What about Agassi's path? If Andre could have a late-career renaissance, why not Murray? 36 is the new 29, and Andre won a Major at 32 in 2003. Hope springs eternal. I respect Andy for continuing to believe.