brokenshoelace
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reactions
- 1,334
- Points
- 113
I simply cannot understand how anyone can call Simon just a pusher. Folks need to use their eyes. The guy has an understanding of how to play tennis that's deep. I'm watching how he's managed to start renting space in Delpo's mind. He's made him lack confidence in the efficacy of his weapons. I've seen him do this type of stuff to Roger as well. It's heartening to watch him victimising someone else to be honest. But to just dismiss this guys work as just pushing? Nah... look again... carefully
Literally no top 30 player is a pusher in modern tennis, I completely agree. People just like to overuse the shit out of that term to describe relatively passive players (Simon has had some stinkers), and styles they don't enjoy (I've heard it said A LOT about Nadal, hilariously). Other than being a high IQ player and a great mover in his prime, Simon actually has good ground-strokes. Yes, he's a counter-puncher, but that does not mean he's a pusher by any means, especially since he's more than capable of producing his own pace off of both wings, which to be fair, isn't a huge achievement in modern tennis, and should be a minimum requirement, but still should be mentioned if the guy is getting undeserved labels.