Carol
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 9,225
- Reactions
- 1,833
- Points
- 113
Yep..then the trolling shall beginAnd here we go............
The usual with articles v. headlines: alarmist headlines are a dime a dozen. However, as to the #1 ranking, there is no "200 Club." You really just made that up. He has to get past 180 weeks to pass McEnroe on the list, which would be nice, but I think passing Novak is untouchable for him (another year,) and so I'm sure he won't care about that. I'm sure he's about Majors and keeping his body healthy. Even Toni has talked about him passing Roger in Majors. That said, he'll still probably play too much, as that is his way.
I agree that there is nothing else in the article but the information about the Brisbane withdrawing, but... I agree with the conclusion. He withdrawn from everything possible before the AO (two EXO´s and one real tournament). The only thing left is the AO. Let´s hope he plays but the pattern is not good.
Given that, not that sure if he'll coast to #1. He had a great first half of the year in 2017 and even healthy that is not easy to repeat. Ok, he's only adversary for #1 in the first half of 2018 is Federer, who also probably won't defend his points, but for the second half everything is up for grabs.
Oh, right, 170 weeks, and Rafa is now at 160. Sure, round numbers are always nice, so I take your point there, but I don't think Rafa will be thinking too much about that. Your example of 99 v. 100 titles, or catching Jimmy's 109 is rather more important, though. Additional titles means more than weeks at #1, if you ask me. But catching the guy ahead of you is the real goal, rather than a random round number. Reaching 200 weeks at #1 looks better on paper, but the next guy ahead of Rafa on the list is Novak, and, as I mentioned, that would be another year at #1, and I don't think that will happen, so it's not really something to strive for. Remember what you guys think happened to Roger when he was theoretically reaching for YE#1. For Rafa, it should be all about Majors at this point, as it is assumed to be with Roger.Well of course I made it up, but all such things are made up by someone. My point it is simply that he might have an eye towards 200, even though it isn’t inherently more impressive than, say, 197. In a similar way that Roger probably likes the idea of finishing his career with 100+ titles rather than 99 (although now he might be thinking about Jimmy’s 109).
By the way, McEnroe has 170 weeks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nostalgia: Last 5 games of AO'17 with commentary.
I'm guessing Nadal fans watched that video, on average, 0.7 times.
What is wrong with all these young players pulling up injured in their early to mid-20s? Had the game become that much more physically taxing? Happy New Years to all!
All the big names will be back for the Australian Open... it's one of the reasons why I love this tournament - injury pullouts are usually pretty minimal with it being so early in the season.
I have never believed that the odd's makers have much imagination or that they pay as much attention to tennis as we do. At this given moment, I think we'd all give Rafa better odds than Novak.Are these guys really giving Djokovic a better chance than Nadal? Either they are not giving importance to Djokovic withdrawal or they assuming Nadal are worst than we think. Ok, both withdraw from the everything in sight, but Djokovic is the guy who is out for about six months.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
J | If back in 2018… | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 36 | |
BMW Open 2018, Munich, Germany, ATP 250 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 53 | ||
Australian Open Final 2018: Federer v Cilic | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 1176 | ||
2018 Australian Open, Melbourne - ATP GRAND SLAM | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 972 | ||
AUSTRALIAN OPEN 2018 Mens Draw Prediction Challenge ATP | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 48 |