the AntiPusher said:Dr Front.. What's your take on Fed's injured back
Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:Dr Front.. What's your take on Fed's injured back
Well, must be bad enough for him to retire at a major final he'd dearly love to have played but most likely just a back spasm like Nadal had. These come and go as quickly as they appeared. If he's not physically fine for DC he sure as hell will be for next year as I can't imagine how anyone could have a back spasm that lasts 1.5 months.
the AntiPusher said:Dr Front.. What's your take on Fed's injured back
Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:Dr Front.. What's your take on Fed's injured back
Well, must be bad enough for him to retire at a major final he'd dearly love to have played but most likely just a back spasm like Nadal had. These come and go as quickly as they appeared. If he's not physically fine for DC he sure as hell will be for next year as I can't imagine how anyone could have a back spasm that lasts 1.5 months.
Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:Dr Front.. What's your take on Fed's injured back
Well, must be bad enough for him to retire at a major final he'd dearly love to have played but most likely just a back spasm like Nadal had. These come and go as quickly as they appeared.
JesuslookslikeBorg said:ye..Federer was hitting today, was passed fit for fri evening or whenever.
tented said:GameSetAndMath said:tented said:He didn't play any in 2010 and 2013.
Actually, Roger Federer was one of the players who were given a "commitment award"
by the ITF in recognition of their demonstrated commitment based on the number of ties
they participated in. This award is not based on performance in DC ties, just based on
participation. Also, this is not a popularity contest. I have provided a link to that effect
earlier. I will do so again when I get time.
Also, if I remember right, neither Rafa nor Novak has got this award.
Why did you post this in response to my citing the fact that Roger did not play a DC match in those two years?
GameSetAndMath said:Odds for individual matches scheduled for Friday.
Jo-wilfried Tsonga (19/17) versus Stan Wawrinka (5/6)
---- Works out to about 54.5% for Stan and 45.5% for Tsonga
Gael Monfils (2) versus Roger Federer (5/11)
---- Works out to about 66.66% for Fed and 33.33% for LaMonf.
the AntiPusher said:GameSetAndMath said:Odds for individual matches scheduled for Friday.
Jo-wilfried Tsonga (19/17) versus Stan Wawrinka (5/6)
---- Works out to about 54.5% for Stan and 45.5% for Tsonga
Gael Monfils (2) versus Roger Federer (5/11)
---- Works out to about 66.66% for Fed and 33.33% for LaMonf.
Front.. I thought you told me back in October that Monfils was out for the DC:snigger
Broken_Shoelace said:Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:Dr Front.. What's your take on Fed's injured back
Well, must be bad enough for him to retire at a major final he'd dearly love to have played but most likely just a back spasm like Nadal had. These come and go as quickly as they appeared.
Yeah, that's exactly why Roger struggled through most of 2013 with a back injury (that is now relapsing) and why Nadal is having stem cell treatment for an injury he sustained in January.
Kieran said:the AntiPusher said:GameSetAndMath said:Odds for individual matches scheduled for Friday.
Jo-wilfried Tsonga (19/17) versus Stan Wawrinka (5/6)
---- Works out to about 54.5% for Stan and 45.5% for Tsonga
Gael Monfils (2) versus Roger Federer (5/11)
---- Works out to about 66.66% for Fed and 33.33% for LaMonf.
Front.. I thought you told me back in October that Monfils was out for the DC:snigger
Front told us last year after Wimbledon that Monfils was serving a silent ban. He played the next day.
Those odds look very generous to the Swiss...