tenisplayrla08
Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 2,319
- Reactions
- 503
- Points
- 113
lindseywagners said:Denisovich said:lindseywagners said:Denisovich said:lindseywagners said:Your words would make more sense if you were rooting for Darcis and Nadal was leading right now.
Not following you. How would it make more sense if Nadal was leading right now? What has rooting for Darcis have to do with that?
Ah, yeah, that was a little vague. To clarify: usually the underdog is coming from the mindset of "I'm playing well. I'm not too far behind, he's only won 12 points more." Though here Nadal is the favorite, so saying that "it's not like Darcis is showing him around" is a little ironic, because typically a comment like that would come from the underdog side. Then again, I think Nadal likes being the underdog. He thrives on that mindset.
Hmm still not following sorry. I was trying to make an assessment of whether Nadal would get upset based on the first two sets. The first two sets were very close, so if it goes on like this Nadal could very well win.
That's what I mean: when things are close the underdog is the one who would usually find a positive in only trailing by a total of 12 points. Thus, I don't think it necessarily indicates that Nadal, the favorite, might come back.
On a different, and more important, note: Why does grass give Nadal more problems than hard courts? He was fine at Indian Wells and clay but here we go again on grass with his knees. I don't understand it.
I'm following you lindseywagners. Your first post of this conversation that is. I don't agree that grass gives Nadal more problems. He's only played one hard court tournament. But, still, he has played on it more in his career. But, even still, he's won 2 grass slams, both here at Wimbledon of course, and only one hard court slam, despite the fact that he's quite good on hard courts and has won plenty hard court tournaments. I don't think he's struggling with the transition is my point. He's moving fine. He's just playing poorly. The grass is not the problem. And by poorly, I mean, poorly for Nadal. He's not awful. Darcis is great, for Darcis. But he's not phenomenal. It's just weird.