calitennis127
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 4,947
- Reactions
- 459
- Points
- 83
Agreed. It's almost as bad as claiming the number will be close to zero by April only to end up with the highest total in the world.
I never made any predictions about numbers, so stop making things up and talking out of your ass (you can say that I implied the numbers wouldn't be that bad, and that gut instinct was clearly right in light of how far off the IMHE model has been). What I said back in March - and still stand by - was that this virus was not so dangerous that it was worth causing mass unemployment and economic devastation over. There are millions of people filing for unemployment benefits, people standing in massive lines outside of food banks, and numerous businesses in danger of not returning. The question is whether that is a price worth paying for a pandemic whose severity has clearly been overstated.
There is something called cost-benefit analysis. Perhaps that is too complicated for you to understand, but I was looking at the whole picture. Unlike you, I wasn't simply going with the fashion of the day and acting like this was the first or worst pandemic in human history. Of course, there is a bias at work here for you, and that is that not only do you want Trump to be discredited, but you want the world's economic system to collapse because of your infantile contempt for what you call "capitalism." So you want there to be mass poverty as a pretext for creating an international nanny state. You won't come out and say it that bluntly but clearly that's the case.
It's also great to see that you completely ignored the chart showing that the United States is 9th per capita. Of course, you have to ignore that data to keep your anti-Trump narrative going that the U.S. has handled this worse than anyone else.
Last edited: