Ha, ha... good try. Your original play was that the global media was so influenced by the Washington Post they were whipped up into a frenzy about the virus. In fact, you cited the BBC and Guardian as two examples.
The BBC reporting has been fairly robust all along:
The death toll now stands at 170, with more than 7,700 cases confirmed in China.
www.bbc.com
The World Health Organization will hold a further emergency meeting on the coronavirus on Thursday.
www.bbc.com
The World Health Organization calls for moves to stop the virus spreading to vulnerable countries.
www.bbc.com
Fourteen people have now been tested for the virus in the UK, including nine awaiting results.
www.bbc.com
Just plain factual reporting... not politically driven hyperbole. In your little world, the BBC should have been calling this a hoax around then right?
You only reinforced my point by sending four articles from late January. My argument here is that Democrats in the United States changed their tune in late February when they realized that the pandemic was spreading and could be used against Trump. That's when they started whipping up the hysteria.
After Trump's travel ban of January 31st, they said the virus was not a big deal and that he was being xenophobic. A few weeks later, when they realized the threat was actually real, they changed their tune and decided on the narrative that the coronavirus was the scariest disease in world history and that Donald Trump was about to let millions die out of negligence.
So how exactly have you refuted my argument, as oppose to strengthen it? Yes, the BBC reported in January that coronavirus was spreading, especially in China. So did Fox News in the United States. That has nothing to do with the hysterical turn that the left-wing media in the United States took at the end of February.
Talking of timelines, you might want to be mindful of your own. Only just over a week ago, you were mocking and scoffing:
As of right now, there are not even 100 DEATHS in the United States from this stupid virus. Not even 100 in a country with a population near 330 million. And almost half of those deceased are people who were in a fucking nursing home in the state of Washington. If you listened to the media and stupid government officials, you would think 100,000 have died. As it is right now, NOT EVEN 100 in the United States have died.
People have been telling you to watch how this is unfolding in Europe with the exponential contagion rates and what happens when health services get overrun. Your head is so stuck so far up Trump's arse you seem unable to process it.
Right, and my point then and now is that the mortality rate is so low that the economy should not be shut down over it. Roughly 22,000 people have already died from the flu this year according to a recent CDC report, and the U.S. was not going to shut down the economy over it even though "social distancing" would work in reducing incidence of the flu.
Coronavirus Overshadows a Deadly Flu Season
The flu has killed 22,000 people so far this year and the season isn’t over.
March 20, 2020
"So far this season, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recorded 36 million flu cases in the U.S., with 370,000 hospitalizations and 22,000 deaths. "