brokenshoelace
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reactions
- 1,334
- Points
- 113
That someone or someones achieving more are from his era and they've never blown incredible opportunities with the frequency Roger has. If you told him even 5 years ago he'd finish with 20 he'd be happy as a clam. But then follow it up by telling him he finished with less majors than Nadal and Djokovic and ended up blowing 5 matches at slams (QF and later) from MP up and he'd probably be disgusted. Not to mention the other bad one, 6-9 in 5th sets in SF or final stage of majors (3-8 before 2017). These guys are competitive, you think they are happy if they end up 2nd or 3rd rate even though they achieved more than other eras? Especially Roger, who is considered a decent amount more talented than the other 2.
Roger shouldn't and wouldn't be happy if either one finishes ahead of him in major count, let alone both. That however, does not mean he's underachieved.