UK Politics Thread

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,599
Reactions
5,693
Points
113
When is the penny going to drop with this buffoon... Tony Blair - You're a busted flush!!

_92637735_mediaitem92637734.jpg


Tony Blair 'to help the UK's politically homeless'

Tony Blair has promised to help "millions of effectively politically homeless people", calling Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn a man of "the far left".

The former prime minister said the state of UK politics "dismayed him".



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38092635


Revenge of the elites?

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...perfectly-credible-case-for-second-referendum
 
  • Like
Reactions: teddytennisfan

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,599
Reactions
5,693
Points
113
Well well well.... honeymoon definitely over for the new PM. All we're left with now is an autopsy to figure out whether this was indeed anti-Brexit or not. And what steps the Tory's have to make to ensure this doesn't get worse. Whether that means a softer form of Brexit or no.. it'll be interesting to see
 
  • Like
Reactions: teddytennisfan

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
THE QUEEN is quite unhappy with THERESAwhoMAY never get a Knighted Lady's title anytime soon..

===============================================
rt.com
Not amused: Queen ‘disappointed’ May won’t spill Brexit secrets
The Queen was reportedly left frustrated with Theresa May after she declined to elaborate on her Brexit strategy during the new prime minister’s first trip to Balmoral.

A source told the Times that the Queen was “disappointed” that May didn’t share her Brexit plans during the visit. It has become a tradition for the PM to visit Her Majesty’s Scottish estate once a year to give them the opportunity to talk in an informal setting.

Read more


May’s failure to go beyond what she has told the public got the Queen's relationship with her 13th prime minister off to a rough start, the newspaper says.

The Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh were said to be looking forward to hearing more about May’s thoughts on Brexit, as well as insights into her cabinet selections and Boris Johnson’s appointment as foreign secretary.

So far, May has revealed very little of her EU exit strategy, despite fierce protestations from all sides of the political spectrum.

On Tuesday, she clashed with MPs on the liaison committee for refusing to give definitive answers, but said she would make a speech giving more details in the new year.

Previous accounts of the prime minister’s visit with the queen, which took place two months after May took office, were more positive.

At the time, the Daily Mail reported that the two women “got on famously,” adding: “There hasn’t been a PM since Harold Wilson who entered so gamely into the outdoor pursuits, parlour games and well-regulated rituals.”

On Thursday, Buckingham Palace called the story an “anonymously sourced conjecture.”

A spokesperson said: “By long-established convention, we never disclose details of discussions between the Queen and her prime ministers. Nor would we comment on anonymously sourced conjecture of this kind.”

Downing Street told the Times: “We never comment on private conversations with the Queen.”
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113


what about now? 'GOD'S GIFT TO THE WORLD OBAMA" ..

is now throwing around ''opinion'' about anything under the sun to anyone that actually thinks he's worth ANYTHING? LOL.
DIDN'T I SAY -- THAT this man obama IS A WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT?

even crow offal is better than him! as far as i am concerned.
never mind his COMPLETE failure in presidency (unless you call SUCCESS the ability to fool enough people to have voted for him at all ..and success is KILLING masses of people with his policies with his foot-soldier terrorists , his drone coward emperor machinery...etc -- then THAT'S 'success") -

but just take , just review what this man has said in the last few weeks alone ...

he couldnt't help throwing a parting shot at Russia that just kept outmaneuvering him at EVERY turn and showing him up to be the WORTHLESS crap that he really is by REPEATING:

"we are the exceptional nation" gospel...
"we are stronger, bigger , russia is smaller, weaker...and produces nothing that anybody wants to buy other than oil and gas"

THAT in the face of russia in a mere 2 HARVESTS oustrips BOTH canada and the USA in NON-GMO food exports! lol..and is NOW earning MORE money FROM food production and exports THAN military exports OR oil and gas. lol. NOT to m,ention a growing list of customers waiting in line for Russian technology!!

is this guy obama for REAL?

BUT NEVER MIND even that about russia -- everyone already knows obama's serious, serious case of ENVY...anyway..

just consider what HE says yesterday about TRUMP:

"if laws allowed me to run for a third term --i'd beat him...people would see and rally behind me pointing at the RIGHT direction" (ya right -- like the 'right direction" of his 8 years!! roflmao) .

he's having a SPAT with netanyahu too - (creep as that zionist terrorist is) - but that only shows what this obama is about...

a complete self-absorbed narcissist -- EXACTLY like i said, anyone care to PROVE otherwise? roflmao...

now he goes after CORBYN and ''disintegrating LABOR?"

well -- what about the DNC? it just lost its ''ne0liberal" version of ''power " for the next 20 years!!! courtesy of OBAMA THE CONQUEROR...who couldn't , try as he might to ORDER britons to follow orders --

get THEM to vote NO to Brexit. and instead BRITONS GAVE him the FINGER as he deserves!! heck it's more than he deserves really -- for anyone to even let him think he's WORTH listening to .

i hope CORBYN gives him a real put-down. lol;

LOL.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
what obama is ''trying" very hard to accomplish is simple:

HIS REAL MASTERS -- his WHITE angl0euro-american masters

the rotschilds, soros, rockefellers, morgans, the bilderbergers, these ''world supremacy" PARASITES in their palaces who are clever to NOT have their hands soiled in public -- just enough strings to pull countries around their fingers (Fed Bnk, BANK of london, deutsche central, brussels, IMF, with the coterie of CIA-MI5, Fench Secret services, german secret services, etc..this much is clear, pentagon, NATO) --

EXPECT one way or another their ''full spectrum dominance" they have played for centuries -- to continue. and obama is NERVOUS to keep himself USEFUL --

roflmao....he is the ULTIMATE ass -licker. i tell you. and his every utterance shows it.

it is all about obama - having FAILED to deliver to his masters the vaunted ''post USSR" ANGL0-AMERICAN washington based global imperial total command by the combined intimidation of NATO/WESTERN army supremacy and TERROR for a ''permanent war" world order of subjugation through FEAR -- IN HIS 8 YEARS -- TRYING to be RELEVANT to his masters.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
rt.com
‘Historic & impressive’: Britain’s ambassador to US breaks silence on Trump election
Britain’s ambassador to the US has broken his silence on US President-elect Donald Trump’s election to the White House, hailing it as an “historic and impressive win like no other in history."

Sir Kim Darroch was caught in a diplomatic row last month when Trump tweeted that former UKIP leader Nigel Farage would do a “great job” as UK ambassador to the US and that “many people” would like to see him in the role.

Downing Street dismissed the suggestion, saying it is for Britain to decide who serves as ambassador.

“There is no vacancy,” a Downing Street spokesperson said. “We already have an excellent ambassador to the US.”

In a bid to smooth relations with Trump, Darroch, writing in the Washington Post, praised Trump’s victory.

“Donald Trump has captured the presidency in a historic and impressive win like no other in history,” he wrote.

“There will, of course, be disappointment felt by those for whom the results did not go the way they hoped. That is the nature of our democratic systems… Now is the time to move forward together and embrace the opportunity ahead.”

Darroch says both Trump and UK Prime Minister Theresa May have vowed to build on the legacy of good relations set by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.

"In their phone calls so far, Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa may have made clear that the special relationship between Britain and the United States is stronger than ever.”

Read more


In his article, Darroch called for a new post-Brexit trading deal between the US and UK. “Some steps Britain and the United States will take together. Trade, for example, is an issue that no country can address alone.

“When we leave the European Union, Britain will use the strength and size of our economy to forge new and dynamic trading relationships, with old allies and new partners, including the United States, our biggest trading partner.

“The United States and Britain will continue to work ever more closely to provide security to each other. As partners who share intelligence and technology, we do more together than any two countries in the world.”

Darroch’s comments come just weeks after Farage visited the Republican President-elect for a third time. According to the Telegraph, senior US Republican figures believe Farage could be given an informal role advising Trump on US/UK relations.

May is yet to meet Trump, and is believed to have only spoken to him briefly on the phone.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
rt.com
‘US Democratic Party in shambles; 2 terms enough to judge Obama’s failed policies’
Barack Obama would lose against Trump worse than Clinton, says Dr.Jack Rasmus. He has stratified the nation more than ever, adds John Hajjar of the American Mideast Coalition for Trump. But Dr. James Lark suggests Obama could have won a third term.

Outgoing US President Barack Obama claims if he had been legally able to run for a third term, he would have been backed by the majority of voters and beaten Donald Trump.

“I’m confident that if I had run again and articulated it, I think I could’ve mobilized a majority of the American people to rally behind it,” Obama told his former adviser, David Axelrod on Monday’s Axe Files podcast.

His successor, Donald Trump, took to Twitter to reject the idea he would have lost, saying his success came from Democrat failures during Obama's time in office.

President Obama said that he thinks he would have won against me. He should say that but I say NO WAY! - jobs leaving, ISIS, OCare, etc.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 26, 2016
Commenting on Obama’s statement, Dr.Jack Rasmus, professor of political economy at St. Mary's College in California, said that “Obama may have lost even worse than Hillary in the election here.”

“If you look back at 2008 - who put Obama in office? It was the industrial working class and unions in the Great Lakes area and also youth under 30 and minorities, particularly Latinos and African-Americans. He didn’t deliver anything for them in the first term, and they gave him one more chance. What did they get? The industrial working class in the Great Lakes area got more free trade and more jobs lost with nothing being done about it,” he continued.

“Youth under 30 – they got a lot of low-paid jobs. Forty percent of youth now have to live with their families because they can’t make enough money in order to sustain themselves. And what did the Latinos get? They got the biggest deportation wave in US economic history,” he added.

In Rasmus’s opinion, “the American people were fed up with Obama policies. Hillary was associated with those policies but they were Obama’s policies and I think that the voters would have turned against him as well.”

Read more


John Hajjar, Co-Chair of American Mideast Coalition for Trump, argues that the result of the American election was “a repudiation of Barack Obama’s eight years in office.”

“His policies and everything he stood for was repudiated in this election. He was a very popular person personally, but his policies were very unpopular. He moved the country way far to the left, and the huge victory that was won by Trump is proof of that,” he told RT.

Obama, he said, is leaving the Democratic Party “in a shambles” not only at the federal level but at the state and local levels as well.

“Obama did tremendous damage to his party by veering so far to the left,” John Hajjar said.

“America is a central-right nation. And politically, socially, culturally Obama moved the US way-way far. And this election in November of this year was a reaction to these failed policies. After two terms we had enough time to judge the efficacy of his policies…That is a record number of people who are not employed in a workforce. The poor have gotten poorer, and the wealthy have gotten wealthier. He has stratified his nation more than any other time in history,” he added.

President Obama campaigned hard (and personally) in the very important swing states, and lost.The voters wanted to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 27, 2016
On the contrary, James Lark, Adjunct Professor at the University of Virginia and former Chair of the Libertarian Party, said that “Obama would have had a pretty good chance.”

“President Obama has demonstrated that when he runs for office, he can mobilize large segments of the American population,” Lark told RT. “It would have been a very close race. I think that Mr. Trump’s assertion that there is no way that President Obama would have won a race against Mr. Trump is a bit of bluster. Obama would have had a very good chance of winning both the popular vote and the Electoral College.”

“I think that many people who would have supported President Obama would not and did not support Hillary Clinton," Lark added.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
mind you -=- this guy -- oBOMBya -

is the same one that in his last ''triumphant tour" of Asia-pacific -- but one done in the PERIPHERIES -- preaching and hectoring to smaller , though reasonably QUITE prosperous countries by strength of THEIR inter-regional trade and relations increasingly tied to china and russia in policies -- since he wouldn't DARE speak such filth in Beijing when he had a chance in APEC (Lol) -

NOR dare to go to moscow HIMSELF...

this is the same man who lectured asia-pacific and the world :

"IT IS THE USA THAT SHOULD BE WRITING GLOBAL RULES OF PARTICIPATION AND ENGAGEMENT -- NOT Russia, NOT china".

I KID YOU NOT -- and was swiftly IGNORED by capitals in ASEAN and across the NON-european eur-ASIAN superlandmass. lol.

and he's going to give OPINION on how Britons are supposed to behave? gimme a break!
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
You can tell Obama is a lame duck by the rhetoric coming out of London from Theresa May regarding Kerry and Obama's comments on Israel.

come already -- how many times does it need to be said?

obama is a WORTHLESS PIECE OF CRAP -- that ''was" ony good in acting out ''confidence" and 'decisiveness'' while talking from both sides of the mouth..whose ambition for personal glory -- narcissist that he is (trump is NOTHING compared to barack on that, at least trump actually makes MONEY, whether you agree with his ''methods" or not, LOL) -

is the only real ''motive" for his entire presidency. that's why he's been so EASY to manipulate by the pentagon, carter, neo-cons,neo-liberals, the cltinon ''dynasty" - because being the social climber narcissist that he is --

he'd ''seen" ahead of him ''full supremacy" by the USA -- laid out in RED CARPET befor ehim -- and all he had to do was do as he was told -- PRETEND that it's HIS conviction -- and act out the part and make the ''decisions' ...nothing was going to oppose THAT ..except a certain smiling RED KING from the Middle Kingdom who'd silently say "get real, BOY".

AND a certain CZAR with his ''nyet"...lol. no MATTER what obama's soros backers and company tried. lol.

is it any wonder Theresa May ''sees the writing on the wall? "

SHE KNOWS who's going to butter her bread and it AIN'T the US federal bank printing machine -- or ''defend" england from those ''russian baddies" with the AMERICAN TURKEYS F-35'S that are OBSOLETE before they can even fly, lol--and it's XI JINPING'S MONEY! -- WHAT HE SAYS -- GOES!

as for obama's new 'parting shot" to putin and trump (imagine that? obama - if we look or believe only the appearance of it - and there REALLY is genuine disconnect between obama and trump and this isn't a new ''bad outgoing cop and good incoming cop routine by the shadow government (which of course is by now so familiar toe veryone) -

about the sanctioning of 35 more russian diplomats expelled from the USA - AND 2 Russian foreign ministry compounds (nyc and maryland CLOSED by the USA) -- WHICH , mind you ARE RUSSIAN TERRITORY AND POSSESSIONS as they were PURCHASED by russia in the 1980s)

FOREIGN MINISTRY spokeswoman Maria Zakharova tweeted:

"APPARENTLY this move by obama reflects the kind of people around him , who are illiterate in diplomacy and policies -- but wht is truly fascinating is in their insistence upon american exceptionalism -- with this action -- obama ends his presidency with BIG BLOT instead of a chance to end it with an elegant point...

and ''what it reveals is something else: that they themselves have REVEALED A BIG SECRET of theirs: that this american exceptionalism is a MASK for their won HELPLESSNESS. "

"but there is ONE person i truly feel PITY for -- i would like to say I am so sorry for YOU, Mister John Kerry.

"i can not imagine what kind of experience it must have been to be humiliated by your own colleagues in your meetings and in your international meetings when some stab you in the back despite all the genuine , professional efforts you hae made.

"mister kerry is not our ally but has always gained our respect as a professional -- but he did not deserve to treated in such a manner by his own colleagues".
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
journal-neo.org
Obama Interfered in the Brexit Vote, Not Putin | New Eastern Outlook
Author: Steven MacMillan
With each passing day, the anti-Russian hysteria in the western world is becoming more absurd and outlandish. For the last few months, we have been told that Russia has been the nefarious force behind numerous political developments over the past year, with the omnipresent Vladimir Putin portrayed as some sort of evil mastermind who possesses superhuman powers, able to control the people of all nations at will.

In the US, after the success of Donald Trump in the presidential election, various individuals and organizations have blamed the election result on Russian hackers. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and certain elements in both the CIA and FBI have been at the forefront of peddling this narrative, with the mainstream media only too happy to regurgitate these baseless claims.

As is the case with numerous other allegations levied against the Russian government, zero evidence has been provided to the public that proves Russia meddled in the US election. In fact, WikiLeaks editor-in-chief, Julian Assange, has categorically stated that the Russian government was not the source of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) leaked emails which WikiLeaks published back in July.

Yet despite the lack of evidence, the Russian meddling narrative continues to be pushed by many, most notably the US President. The US has just announced that in retaliation for supposed Russian meddling in the election, 35 Russian diplomats will be expelled, two Russian facilities in the US will be closed and more sanctions will be imposed on Moscow.

Russia is not just being blamed for meddling in the US presidential election however, but also for the outcome of the June referendum in Britain over membership in the European Union (EU). Speaking to the House of Commons in mid-December, the ardent remain campaigner and Labour MP, Ben Bradshaw, hysterically tried to argue that Russian hackers were responsible for the British people voting to leave the EU (emphasis added):

“I don’t think we have even began to wake up to what Russia is doing when it comes to cyber warfare. Not only their interference – now proven – in the American presidential campaign, [but] probably in our own referendum. We don’t have the evidence yet, but I think it is highly probable.”

Similar to the narrative that Russia meddled in the US election, Bradshaw’s accusation is backed up by no evidence, as he himself admitted in his outburst. Contrary to Russian meddling, the facts prove that leaders of various other powers interfered in the Brexit vote, albeit unsuccessfully managing to sway the British people.

The German Chancellor for instance, Angela Merkel, publicly urged the British people to vote to remain in the EU, and emphasised the consequences of a Brexit vote. But Merkel’s interference in the referendum was nothing compared to the degree to which Barack Obama attempted to influence the British public.

The US President used his visit to Britain in April to engage in a total media blitz, throwing his weight firmly behind the remain campaign. Obama penned an article (or his speechwriters did) for the Telegraph, in which he strongly argued that Britain was best served remaining in the EU. Obama reiterated his position in a press conference with the then British leader, David Cameron, stating that:

“The Prime Minister and I discussed the upcoming referendum here on whether or not the UK should remain part of the European Union. Let me be clear, ultimately this is something that the British voters have to decide for themselves. But as part of our special relationship, part of being friends, is to be honest, and to let you know what I think; and speaking honestly, the outcome of that decision is a matter of deep interest to the United States because it affects our prospects as well. The United States wants a strong United Kingdom as a partner; and the United Kingdom is at its best when it’s helping to lead a strong Europe. It leverages UK power to be part of the European Union. As I wrote in the op-ed here today, I don’t believe the EU moderates British influence in the world, it magnifies it.”

Contrary to Obama and Merkel however, the Kremlin and Vladimir Putin refrained from taking a public position on the matter. In the words of the BBC journalist, Steven Rosenberg, Russia said “absolutely nothing” during the entire referendum debate in Britain. All the politicians, intelligence agencies and journalists who are peddling the Russian meddling narrative, need to spend more time studying the facts than spreading fake news.

Steven MacMillan is an independent writer, researcher, geopolitical analyst and editor of The Analyst Report, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

2
 

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,436
Reactions
6,262
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
I think Obama interjecting into the Brexit debate backfired if anything... not that I imagine it had a huge influence on the result either way...
 
  • Like
Reactions: teddytennisfan

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
I think Obama interjecting into the Brexit debate backfired if anything... not that I imagine it had a huge influence on the result either way...

so true.

the thing about it is: what was HE or washington masters of the world thinking? they've become so habituated to bombing and invading countries -- and surely would't do to ''fellow angl0's" or europeans as THAT of course is what serves as the ''foundation" of america's ''legitimacy" (allthat bombing andinstitutions) - without which what is the USA really? a ROGUE STATE that -- oh wait -- bombs and invades -- oh wait -- THAT is called RAIDING someone's house...

so with this habituation -- they've convinced themselves they can play the ''talk game" over the heads of the british PEOPLE? what were they thinking? he?

he could just take a flight -- emerge like the emperor come to tell the 'inhabitants:

"BREAK up that exit line -- and go back to WORK -- you PLEBES"!!?
HE and the washington elite think that because they could twist angela's face any which way -- make cameron and blair obey ''and fix the facts around the policy" as in WMDS of saddam that never existed...remember the downing street leaks? -

that where it came to the people ON the STREETS of england and britain they are going to be told that they haven't had ENOUGH of the Brussels administrators?

what a FOOLISH CLOWN he is. BRITAIN surely will feel the 'pain' of 'separation' of however THAT is managed , NOT LEAST because the leadership is such a POODLE to the american and brussels and european banks anyway -- all of them obeying - in essence the washington diktat -- and see what they get? collapsing europe.

BUT whatever britain manages in the short term -- and most importantly the ordinary =folks FINDING A WAY TO FORCE their leadership to pay attention to THEM and their needs -- and deal with that TOLL business of exiting -- which ,imo, is a form of BLACKMAIL by brussels and rotterdam and berlin - on ANY country in the 'peripheries" of EU -

i believe this was a proper decision by the population at large.

in many ways -- the trouble with britain -- as with most countries for that matter -- is there are basically TWO ''countries'

in britain -- it is the CITY OF LONDON -- and then 'the rest of the country". and whatever may is conjuring has more to do with what's good for the parliamentarians and their various connections - in and out of britain -- which they don't want to sacrifice whatever perks and privileges they get out of it -- THAN anything to do with ordinary folks who made THEIR will and understanding known: that ''we ordinary folks werent getting much out of this EU -- just getting our wallets pilfered -- our national industries and local economies ruined, our public commons sacrificed to the brussels demands" --

so -- why PAY taxes to EU for THAT? SO THAT A business or trader in britain can pass import to EU markets with less taxes -- ? they can get that elsewhere -- there's china, there's iran upcoming, there's russia, etc. etc.

and figure out a one-on-one arrangement or join another customs free commons. whatever. ..why should it be brussels telling a country how and who with its citizens can do business with?

and so - it comes down to WHY obama had to go and give a royal command to people who KNOW what royalty is!! AND whether or not they are going to bend the knee or not!! as far as they will tolerate -- and they ALONE will tolerate.

that really just showed his idea that he is lord and master..what a creep.

i'm glad the brits gave him the collective finger. lol.

but really - this is the point where the leadership has to show for WHOM they stand -- their COUNTRY OR the USA -- THROUGH THE former EU membership OR outside of it. - it boils down to that.

and from the ''destruction" of that arrangement is what the BRITONS should enforce their will - one way or another -- on their own leadership.

and imo -- THAT is how britain will FIND its true strength as an independent -- relatively small in territory -- but very creative nation and peoples - .

it's NOT about past imperial glory -- that is nonsense and futile to try and regain that kind of ''clout " which benefits only the corporations and the financiers in london anyway -- its about the ENERGY and resourcefulness and creativity of the TRUE treasure of the british --

their PEOPLE -- with continued sharpening of skills, education, creativity, entrepreneurship - bold ideas, a penchant for amazing efficiency if they want,

EVERY COUNTRY has its resources in both people and natural riches and both are related to one another in how they become what they are -- and that is what countries can rely on -- in fact - really the ONLY thing they can rely on as THEIR own value in this world.

if you bother to just check cursorily what's going on in the ''wild wild china" nowadays -- you find in their news cycles PLENTY of stories covering british people -- setting up this and that little business or trade or whatever -- creating their niche and connections -- plenty of things that comes from THEM IN THEIR BRAINS and creativity that the chinese are lapping up.

they didn't bring GOLD or steel - they brought that uncanny ability to find that ''right note" that nobody heard...

like a young british film-maker - who found investors -- got jackie chan , arnold schwarzenegger or someone of that stature, convinced already established chiense stars and japanese stars to perform in a film and script he made - i forget the subject -- but something on the history of china/britain -- i probably would involve about tha tbusiness of the opium wars or something...

but there you go -- that's going to be BIG TIME. but if it is told in proper ways -- it can generate not just loads of money -- but perhaps a TRUE healing between the countries -- opening the way for leaders to think about what THEIR responsibilities are to BOTH peoples.

now -- should THAT succeed -- (i just remember that jackie chan took care of finding the financing) - what does it show?

that a young british guy could do what even the POWER of the communist party of china couldn't find -- the RIGHT person to do the script - the screenplay -- the research and putting it all together and envisioning how a film will tell a story that is a permanent part of history .....

it is NO small matter that the influence of ATTENBOROUGH inc reating that phenomenal \\''PLANET EARTH'" Series and the enormous resources and skills required to put it together over several years -- shown by responsible governments -- to educate people -- and in its own way BETTER than many other ways for people who can't have direct knowledge of nature resource challenges -- to be aware of what's at stake about ''economies and the market". and HOLD their governments and corporations to ACCOUNT.

but that is just in the area of film-making with the proper quality, clarity and intent--

there is NO reason why in any other industry the BRITONS will not prosper on the strength of their creative energies WITHOUT the need to be bending the knee to Brussels OR its counterpart money gamblers in the city of london.

and , personally -- THAT'S what i want to see from the brits. i can't understand why the country even flirted with EU to begin with. although i know that it was a very ''forced" marriage even from the beginning -- and that already showed -- something is NOT right -- something ULTERIOR to what the ordinary citizen needed or desired was going on.

and that something -- i tell you -- IS washington dc, wall street and the USA treasury and federal bank.

it always is -- it just so happens that in THIS case of brexit -- the british people 'sensed" one way or another -- THEY are the victims they were MEANT to be. by the overlords..carefully -- step by step SETTING them up that way. and when BRUSSELS' - EU internal rot began to show its exposed face --

oh my god -- the POINTLESS SALARIED EU masters and bureaucrats who are PARASITES (JUST take note of that filth STOLTENBERG or NATO, - since that is connected - or that JUNCKER adn that TUSK and MOGHERINI)

NATURALLY -- the ordinary brits could see right through the whoel facade and signed ''BREXIT". before BERLIN came to get THEIR cottages and railways according to the DEALS made in the halls of power between london , berlin, brussels, all under dictates by uncle sam and goldman sachs...

like they all did to GREECE with portugal, spain, italy next inline UNLESS they TOO do something about it. before it's REALLY too late.

every country has its unique challenges according to its history, culture, conditions, geography, climate and season and resources as well as its population's particular readiness to contend with those conditions.

it is WRONG for private bankers and finance industries to take advantage of countries and their peoples and resources to fatten the wallets of these bankers of global capital -- centered primarily around the atlantic coasts.

and europeans ought to learn by now that THEY as a populaton are only as good as being the fodder and glorified slaves compared to the others elsewhere who are enslaved even MORE in even WORSE conditions as their resoources are plundered by these ''finance" nd corporate lords who think they are the rightful rulers -- these ilk of bill gates, george soros, jeff bezos, zukerman of facebook, and their kind who go to the DAVOS and BILDERBERG orgasm parties ...

while they move people around like so much commodities like banana or shirt buttons...

and this is something PUTIN reminded his people :

"we can not be a country that just trades peole around as if they were commodities (lowering the value of humans) - simply to make the pockets of a few private bankers and people happy..if we go down that route -- we are finished as a country and a society".

"what is the market? it is a part of the economy -- what is the economy? it is what people make it -- it is the people and what they use resources for...but the economy and market should serve the people that brought them into existence -- not the other way around".

''we all want material wealth, possession, comforts, good food, friendships, raise our families, success, recognition for our achievements, our vacations and cars and homes and toys ...and we have even defended it with our lives...
but without a spiritual conscience -- something higher than material possessions -- we live life that has no meaning...

"when people ask me what is the russian? i think the russian is that which believes that to live means to live a life with conscience...and this is influenced and shaped by what we are given in challenges and blessings by our land...

and for this reason -- with all the scientific and technological and intellectual advances -- we and nations have to cooperate to move our energies towards creating NATURE-LIKE technologies so that we disturb the land as little as possible..

''as as we open the land, such as siberia -- to more food production -- we must simultaneously ensure that the surrounding natural life is respected -- and find ways to harmoniously create farms with the needs of the natural world from which we derive everything for our existence..

"therefore, with this in mind...i think that we are who we are as a reflection of the grandeur of our land".
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
I think Obama interjecting into the Brexit debate backfired if anything... not that I imagine it had a huge influence on the result either way...

and look at his recent 'moves "

not just vengeful at putin and russia -- for upstaging him and exposing his fraudulence -- but now throwing everything he can to ensure TRUMP is forced to contend with ''the obama policies"

what a creepy person this obama is.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
mrzz World Affairs 2462
T World Affairs 13
britbox World Affairs 82
britbox World Affairs 8946
britbox World Affairs 46