i don't get this obsession with attakcing play. if everyone went for winners stright away no rally woud be longer than 3 hots and there'd be tons of unforced errors and tenni would be really boring! there'd be no development of rallies, no contructing of points, no creating of space to then play the wiiner, no vriety of shot.
i feel like i am living in a different tennis universe form some on here. I like long rallies, i like it when the points are given time to develop, when you see difffrent vairites of pace and psin, when plaers truy to eleicti erros fromt ehier oppoent by putting the ball in awkward positions, rather than just going for wiiners themselvs. i don[t like it when players go for winners too earlh ina rally too often, it makes it boring for me. i like seeing players stay in rllies with amazing defence, and turn defencein attack with amazing shots on teh run. but if any tennis player does anyting other thn attack on every ball, some on here call it boring 'pushing', when for me the boring thing is the attacking play!